Top 8 Functional Testing Tools
Tricentis ToscaMicro Focus UFT OneSelenium HQSmartBear TestCompleteWorksoft CertifyLambdaTestSauce LabsVisual Studio Test Professional
It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications.
What I find valuable is that Tricentis is always refining the test methodology. They listen to feedback from the analysts about what the testing tool should do, and then Tricentis always implements it. So all the necessary testing functions are already implemented in their tools.
Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge.
Selenium is the fastest tool compared to other competitors. It can run on any language, like Java, Python, C++, and .NET. So we can test any application on Selenium, whether it's mobile or desktop.
It is very easy to maintain tests with this tool. It covers all necessary items in the test plan. The most painful item in testing is maintenance. When changes occur, the tests should be maintained.
The decoupling of the test scripts from the data and the application is a nice feature. When you are creating test scripts, for example, for a web application, you have to learn about Worksoft and how the controls of a screen can be interpreted by Worksoft. For that purpose, you create so-called maps. These maps are loosely coupled to your scripts, which means if the application is changed, the control will be changed from an identifier. You don't need to rework the entire script. You only need to do these adjustments in the map, and then you can automatically reuse the scripts. So, it is really a smart move to have the decoupling of scripts, maps, and data.
The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID.
So far, the stability has proven to be quite good.
Live device testing. As we all know, It's really hard and challenging to find/purchase many real devices to test because it will be costly and not all the team can be able to purchase all of the devices out there. We used to have a lot of real devices under our labs. However, it is really time-consuming to maintain those devices and make sure they are up to date with the testing requirements.
Easy to use and easily scalable.
The stability has always been very good.
Advice From The CommunityRead answers to top Functional Testing Tools questions. 542,721 professionals have gotten help from our community of experts.
What can be done to reduce the chances of software failing?
There are so many tools to choose from to do SAP testing. In your opinion, which tool is the best choice for SAP testing? What differentiates this tool from its competitors?
There are so many tools to choose from for non-SAP testing. In your opinion, which tool is best for non-SAP testing? What makes this tool stand out?