Load Testing Tools users
have shared their experience with us

Updated NOVEMBER 2021

Simplify your research with trusted advice from people like you. Would you like to learn about products from people using them now?

Download our FREE Load Testing Tools report based on 55+ real user experiences with these popular products:

...and 17 more!

Where should we email your report?






Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional review

Prashant Sarswat
Prashant Sarswat
Head - Testing Centre of Excellence at NIIT Technologies Limited
Very good controller and a market leader, but not cost effective for small business
The technical support is not as great as we expected them to be. The one or two times we have connected with them, they referred us to a model. They often say they will get back to us instead of helping us immediately. It's not very good. The last issue we had was related to some specific application. The tool was not able to identify the...
Tricentis NeoLoad review

Patrik Badkar
Patrik Badkar
Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts
LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more...

Since 2012, we've had 554,873 professionals use our research.

As seen in