We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface.""We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pros →

"The interface is good.""It's a scalable product.""Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Pros →

Cons
"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to.""It could be better in connecting with Windows Server instances."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Cons →

"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed.""They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment.""Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."
  • More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."
  • "Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."
  • More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Replication and performance tuning are valuable features.
    Top Answer: 
    Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing cost.
    Top Answer: 
    I think deployment of the solution could be streamlined quite a bit. It takes quite an effort when you're bringing it up cold. Patch management could also be streamlined and simplified, keeping up to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    7,797
    Comparisons
    7,252
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    401
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    1,053
    Comparisons
    971
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    514
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.

    When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.

    It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.

    Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

    Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

    Offer
    Learn more about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)
    Learn more about Oracle Database Backup Service
    Sample Customers
    Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
    Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Media Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Media Company9%
    Government8%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 7th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 2 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8.6, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "Enables us to predict our storage needs over time and start small and grow as we need ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "Scales well, is easy to install, and has good support". Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Google Cloud Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Google Cloud Storage Nearline and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Amazon S3 Glacier and Azure NetApp Files. See our Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.