We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Amazon S3 vs Google Cloud Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon S3 Logo
4,279 views|3,420 comparisons
Google Cloud Storage Logo
2,694 views|2,348 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Google Cloud Storage and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Amazon S3 has multiple types of data detection. You can store data on a monthly basis, yearly basis, and long term basis.""The initial setup is not difficult or overly complex. It's very straightforward and easy to implement.""The main aspect we like is that it's been easy to use.""Enables content sharing by multiple users.""Some of the most valuable features are how convenient and easy to use S3 is. It's nicely integrated with AWS and is available on the AWS console.""This solution is good at storing historical data and we were using it for other purposes.""It is easy to manage and easy to understand.""The most valuable features are unlimited storage, scalability, and performance."

More Amazon S3 Pros →

"It's user-friendly. We find it to be very easy to use.""It's easy to use.""It is stable and scalable.""From an availability perspective it's fantastic; from a security perspective it's fantastic.""The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is the filter option. You can search with some artificial intelligence kinds of features. For example, if I search for a beach, it'll show me all the beach-related pictures, which I took five or ten years before. So this is a cool feature that I've seen. They give as many features as they can to make it better, so I'm happy with this solution.""The most valuable features are the ease and accessibility of information.""The most valuable features are stability and ease of use.""I have more than enough personal storage and have had no security issues."

More Google Cloud Storage Pros →

Cons
"The pricing and licensing are pretty complex.""They could always increase object storage ability.""The security model can be improved as it is a bit confusing.""We need the mapping to Windows. That feature is needed in S3. That feature is in the Azure cloud where we can map it like a drive. We can map the cloud storage to the effort driving our Windows PC. But Amazon is not providing that feature for the S3 solution.""It could maybe use more integration.""When we need to find the queries there is no user interface, it is the only textual format that is bulky. If we need some data we will use Athena for queries and we will get results. When comparing this solution to others, such as DataDog, they provide a wonderful UI, and user-friendly dashboards, and many other features that this solution is lacking.""Technical support could have a faster response time.""The only pain point is migrating the life cycle policy because if someone is a newbie, they cannot easily create the life cycle policy."

More Amazon S3 Cons →

"The user interface could be more intuitive.""The solution should offer more free storage.""Its security should be better from the data security point of view. It should be more secure, and it should get tightly integrated with products such as Google Docs and Google Sheets. Microsoft covers different kinds of tools such as Microsoft Office, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel.""They need more enhancements in the security features.""The solution should have two factor authentication.""I would like to see better pricing.""It would be helpful to offer more packages to increase the storage.""The problem I face right now is that my data warehouse is being hosted on Google Cloud, however, integration between Google Cloud to Microsoft Azure is a big problem."

More Google Cloud Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing is pay as you go, and I'm happy with the pricing."
  • "The cost of storage is cheap. However, the cost to have a better interface can get expensive. We are using Athena for this purpose and if we did some heavy queries the cost will start adding up. When the Athena query is running, it will scan the bucket and they charge for how many GBs we are going to scan. The function of scanning has a lot of costs attached to it, this is a negative point."
  • More Amazon S3 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Better pricing would be helpful."
  • "Its price is fine."
  • "It's about nearly $10,000 USD to use the services on GCP, however, Google gave us a good deal which is why we originally went with them."
  • "The solution is free."
  • "They have recently changed their pricing structures, it used to be free but now it is a paid service. However, I am on a monthly subscription and the price is reasonable."
  • "The price could be cheaper."
  • "The price of the license could be cheaper. We are on an annual subscription."
  • "I pay a yearly subscription fee."
  • More Google Cloud Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Amazon S3 has multiple types of data detection. You can store data on a monthly basis, yearly basis, and long term basis.
    Top Answer: 
    The licensing is pay as you go, and I'm happy with the pricing.
    Top Answer: 
    The only pain point is migrating the life cycle policy because if someone is a newbie, they cannot easily create the life cycle policy. This is because there are multiple, additional ways. If I want… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Its security should be better from the data security point of view. It should be more secure, and it should get tightly integrated with products such as Google Docs and Google Sheets. Microsoft covers… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    4,279
    Comparisons
    3,420
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    467
    Rating
    8.9
    Views
    2,694
    Comparisons
    2,348
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    283
    Rating
    8.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    S3, Simple Storage Service
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

    Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.

    Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage. Google created three simple product options to help you address the needs of your applications while keeping your costs low. These three product options use the same API, providing you with a simple and consistent method of access.

    Offer
    Learn more about Amazon S3
    Learn more about Google Cloud Storage
    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
    Autism Speaks, Backflip Studios, Beneficio Facil, Bitmovin, Claritics, CloudBerry, Cosentry, DNANexus, DNAstack, Energyworx, Feedly, GenieConnect, HTC, JustDevelopIt, LeadPages, Leanplum, LiveHive, Mendelics, Ocado, RealMassive, Screenz, ShareThis, Songpop, Ubisoft, VendAsta, Webydo, Wix, zulily
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company33%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Media Company8%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Educational Organization13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Media Company6%
    Government4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise33%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Google Cloud Storage and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 is ranked 5th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 8 reviews while Google Cloud Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 24 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 9.0, while Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Secure, scalable, and easy to manage and understand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Easy to use and scalable with excellent technical support". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Zadara and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Microsoft Azure File Storage, Huawei FusionStorage and AT&T Cloud Storage. See our Amazon S3 vs. Google Cloud Storage report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.