We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Apache JMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
18,415 views|15,341 comparisons
Cavisson NetStorm Logo
685 views|389 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It is open source as well as relatively extendable. It allows us to extend and add additional functionality and features. Its deployment is also very easy.""A lot of things are valuable. It is free. It has a lot of features, such as report generation and integration with CI/CD, which makes it very competitive with the other paid solutions available in the market. It is a good solution.""The recording and playback functionality is helpful.""User-friendly and open source.""The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""Scripting with the solution is good.""The reports and analysis tools are very good. They are the solution's most valuable features.""The scripting ability is most valuable. It is easy to use. There is a UI, and you can go in there and figure those things out. After you've got a good set of tests, you basically have a scripted document that you can grab and execute in a pipeline. It is pretty quick to set up, and you can scale it and version control it."

More Apache JMeter Pros »

"Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way.""NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage."

More Cavisson NetStorm Pros »

Cons
"Automation is difficult in JMeter.""The installation needs some work. It could be simplified.""The solution needs to improve reporting. Currently, there is not enough automation involved with the feature. For example, there should be an automatic way of saving reports.""You really need a technical team in order to really utilize the product.""The interface could be made more user-friendly.""JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training.""Considering the kinds of tests we are performing here, where we launch several tests at the same time as a batch request, JMeter is not the best tool for the job. Those kinds of things could be done easily with other tools, like T6.""Because so much is being done these days with authentication processes, a better system for either getting bearer tokens or some kind of token-based authentication prior to executing APIs would benefit the product. It is there, and you can do things. It is just not real clean at this point. There should be a better authentication process for JMeter or some automation or better guidelines for gaining and utilizing tokens on the fly."

More Apache JMeter Cons »

"The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs.""Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window."

More Cavisson NetStorm Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free.""When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice""We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version.""I haven't looked into it. Most of our projects are nonprofit or grant-based. Everything is public commons, so we don't really have to worry about that so much.""This is an open-source product.""I was using the free version of the software."

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share them… more »
Top Answer: Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We… more »
Top Answer: We appreciate that the solution is free to use, as an open-source tool.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
18,415
Comparisons
15,341
Reviews
16
Average Words per Review
562
Rating
7.6
6th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
685
Comparisons
389
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
640
Rating
9.5
Comparisons
Also Known As
JMeter
Learn More
Cavisson
Video Not Available
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

Cavisson NetStorm is a cost-effective, performance enhancing and easy-to-use appliance for enterprise applications. It is an extremely powerful load generator that provides an accurate estimation of Client Perceived Response Time (CPRT) enabling IT companies to guarantee the Service Level Agreements (SLA). Its advanced technology efficiently handles load variables, user realism, application realism and network realism. NetStorm is a proven solution providing root cause of the issues where legacy solutions failed, prompting Several Fortune 100 companies switching over to using NetStorm.

Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about Cavisson NetStorm
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm32%
Computer Software Company21%
Educational Organization11%
University5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
REVIEWERS
Retailer92%
Computer Software Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer29%
Computer Software Company29%
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Financial Services Firm3%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise54%
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise74%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Load Testing Tools with 17 reviews while Cavisson NetStorm is ranked 6th in Load Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Cavisson NetStorm is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Easy to learn, and free to use but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cavisson NetStorm writes "Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, ReadyAPI and SoapUI Pro, whereas Cavisson NetStorm is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. See our Apache JMeter vs. Cavisson NetStorm report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.