We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Apache JMeter vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations.""The performance of the solution is excellent.""JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.""It is open source as well as relatively extendable. It allows us to extend and add additional functionality and features. Its deployment is also very easy.""We appreciate that the solution is free to use, as an open-source tool.""I like the fact that JMeter integrates well with other tools.""A lot of things are valuable. It is free. It has a lot of features, such as report generation and integration with CI/CD, which makes it very competitive with the other paid solutions available in the market. It is a good solution."

More Apache JMeter Pros »

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pros »

Cons
"I sometimes found the documentation to be not as explanatory as I would've liked it. In the cases that I can think of, I was looking for a rather hand-holding approach with Step A, B, and C, but then I realized that with a product that is open source like this, you can't do handholding. That is because there are so many different uses and different unique environments and setups for it, but I remember thinking a few times that if they only just said this.""Currently, the integration pipeline is implemented by using Jenkins or a similar tool platform. These are continuous integration tools. As far as I know, integration is done by using custom scripts. It would be good if the integration with a continuous integration pipeline, like Jenkins or Hudson, can be done out of the box without using a script.""It should start supporting the presentation layer. It currently provides performance testing specifically at the application and API level. It can be extended to the presentation layer, which includes mainly Angular and React frameworks. It should also be easy to use and easy to train people.""The interface could be made more user-friendly.""JMeter output reports can be difficult to understand without training.""It's not easy to get the data from one place or to do customizations.""The plug-ins make the reports heavy and they have to be run in non-GUI mode.""They can improve it a little bit in terms of distribution load testing. We struggled with it during the distribution. In terms of reporting, runtime monitoring is not currently included, and it should be included. They can also improve it on the reporting side in terms of the comparison of the reports. They can also focus more on integration with CI/CD. Currently, people are using their own customized tools. It would be nice if Apache can provide some standard tools and procedures for integration with CI/CD tools like DPR. There are some tools, but it would be nice if official standard tools and procedures are available."

More Apache JMeter Cons »

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This is an open-source product.""In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free.""I was using the free version of the software.""I haven't looked into it. Most of our projects are nonprofit or grant-based. Everything is public commons, so we don't really have to worry about that so much.""When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice""We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version."

More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share them… more »
Top Answer: Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We… more »
Top Answer: We appreciate that the solution is free to use, as an open-source tool.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
18,415
Comparisons
15,341
Reviews
16
Average Words per Review
562
Rating
7.6
10th
Views
3,004
Comparisons
1,995
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
344
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
JMeter
OATS
Learn More
Overview

Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.
Offer
Learn more about Apache JMeter
Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
Sample Customers
AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm32%
Computer Software Company21%
Educational Organization11%
University5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government7%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise54%
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Performance Testing Tools with 17 reviews while Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 10th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Easy to learn, and free to use but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Easy to use, good central test repository, and responsive technical support". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, ReadyAPI and Tricentis NeoLoad, whereas Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and Katalon Studio.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.