We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Apache JMeter vs Tricentis Flood comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache JMeter Logo
18,548 views|15,487 comparisons
Tricentis Flood Logo
939 views|645 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"JMeter is easy to use for a user who doesn't have too much knowledge of programming or certain languages.""A lot of things are valuable. It is free. It has a lot of features, such as report generation and integration with CI/CD, which makes it very competitive with the other paid solutions available in the market. It is a good solution.""Scripting with the solution is good.""The most valuable feature in JMeter is the Thread Group, which helps us to see whether the performance is good.""When there's a high number of TPS I can achieve more transactions per seconds given the hyper-limitations.""It is open source as well as relatively extendable. It allows us to extend and add additional functionality and features. Its deployment is also very easy.""We appreciate that the solution is free to use, as an open-source tool.""User-friendly and open source."

More Apache JMeter Pros →

"You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution.""Their technical support is awesome.""The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need."

More Tricentis Flood Pros →

Cons
"The plug-ins make the reports heavy and they have to be run in non-GUI mode.""The interface could be made more user-friendly.""Currently, the integration pipeline is implemented by using Jenkins or a similar tool platform. These are continuous integration tools. As far as I know, integration is done by using custom scripts. It would be good if the integration with a continuous integration pipeline, like Jenkins or Hudson, can be done out of the box without using a script.""It should start supporting the presentation layer. It currently provides performance testing specifically at the application and API level. It can be extended to the presentation layer, which includes mainly Angular and React frameworks. It should also be easy to use and easy to train people.""The installation needs some work. It could be simplified.""It has some proxy-based dependencies which require specific proxies to be set up or disabled, which causes problems.""It's not easy to get the data from one place or to do customizations.""We're like the solution to be more user-friendly."

More Apache JMeter Cons →

"The solution is quite immature, it is not in an optimal state.""The performance of the tool needs to improve.""We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool."

More Tricentis Flood Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an open-source product."
  • "I was using the free version of the software."
  • "In terms of open-source adoption, it is completely free."
  • "We are using the free version, and if required, we can easily switch to the other version."
  • "When comparing the price with Load Runner, and if the cost is an issue then JMeter is a better choice"
  • "I haven't looked into it. Most of our projects are nonprofit or grant-based. Everything is public commons, so we don't really have to worry about that so much."
  • More Apache JMeter Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools."
  • "The only positive point is it came free with my test automation tool."
  • More Tricentis Flood Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Postman lets you easily define variables, which then get updated automatically. This is a huge time-saver and makes processes very efficient. We can also export the test cases we create and share them… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We… more »
    Top Answer: 
    You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution.
    Top Answer: 
    The positive point we were able to achieve the objective as per plan.
    Top Answer: 
    The solution is not in an optimal state. During POC, we analyzed tool is kept on upgrading. The patch deployment is happening in parallel, things that are working today are not working tomorrow. We… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    18,548
    Comparisons
    15,487
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    559
    Rating
    7.6
    10th
    out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    939
    Comparisons
    645
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    552
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    JMeter
    Flood IO
    Learn More
    Overview

    Apache JMeter may be used to test performance both on static and dynamic resources, Web dynamic applications. It can be used to simulate a heavy load on a server, group of servers, network or object to test its strength or to analyze overall performance under different load types.

    Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based, distributed load testing platform that helps teams test, analyze and improve the way their applications scale - with seamless integration across the DevOps pipeline. With Tricentis Flood, you can achieve a continuous view of application performance and go live with confidence.

    Offer
    Learn more about Apache JMeter
    Learn more about Tricentis Flood
    Sample Customers
    AOL, Orbitz, Innopath Software, PrepMe, Sapient, Corporate Express Australia, CSIRO, Ephibian, Talis, DATACOM, ALALOOP, eFusion, Panter, Sourcepole, University of Western Cape
    Nike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm32%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Educational Organization11%
    University5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Energy/Utilities Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government11%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise54%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache JMeter vs. Tricentis Flood and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache JMeter is ranked 1st in Load Testing Tools with 17 reviews while Tricentis Flood is ranked 10th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews. Apache JMeter is rated 7.6, while Tricentis Flood is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Apache JMeter writes "Easy to learn, and free to use but could be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Flood writes "Awesome technical support, integrates well, and installation is easy". Apache JMeter is most compared with Postman, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, ReadyAPI and Tricentis NeoLoad, whereas Tricentis Flood is most compared with Tricentis NeoLoad, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. See our Apache JMeter vs. Tricentis Flood report.

    See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.