We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Azure Front Door vs NGINX App Protect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Front Door vs. NGINX App Protect and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The price is one of the most important aspects of the product. It's quite affordable.""You can assign as many web application firewall policies as you want to the same instance of Front Door.""It inspects the traffic at the network level before it comes into Azure. We can do SSL offloading, and it can detect abnormalities before the traffic comes into the application. It can be used globally and is easy to set up. It is also quite stable and scalable."

More Azure Front Door Pros →

"The most valuable feature is that there is a link in the system that will help to analyze the security of an application when something abnormal is found.""WAF is useful to track mitigation, inclusion, prevention, and the parametric firewall.""The most valuable feature is that I can establish different services from the firewall.""We were looking for a product that is capable of complete automation and a container based solution. It's working."

More NGINX App Protect Pros →

Cons
"We should be able to use Front Door defenders with multiple cloud vendors. Currently, they can be used only with the Azure cloud. Azure Front Door should also be able to do global load balancing and provide internal front door services. Microsoft should clearly define what Traffic Manager, Application Gateway, and Azure Front Door products do. These are similar products, and people get confused between these products.""There is room for improvement and they're working on it.""I'm responsible for the governance and cost control of Azure. I'm not a specialist in any products and therefore I couldn't really speak effectively to features that are lacking or missing."

More Azure Front Door Cons →

"It's challenging if you need to go for a high throughput.""Setting policies and parameters through the UI should be more automated because the process is manual, where we can only edit one rule at a time.""The configuration needs to be more flexible because it is difficult to do things that are outside of the ordinary.""As far as scalability, it takes a long time for deployment."

More NGINX App Protect Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is on a pay-as-you-go basis."
  • More Azure Front Door Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing fees for this solution are pretty expensive for what it does, but there is no alternative."
  • "Our licensing costs are about $40,000 a year."
  • "Really understand the licensing model, because we underestimated that."
  • More NGINX App Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the… more »
    Top Answer: 
    You can assign as many web application firewall policies as you want to the same instance of Front Door.
    Top Answer: 
    The pricing is pretty good. It's reasonably priced in general.
    Top Answer: 
    We were looking for a product that is capable of complete automation and a container based solution. It's working.
    Top Answer: 
    The licensing is yearly, and we have two teams using NGINX App Protect. Just our team has a yearly fee of maybe $25,000. It's not a lot, but it's because we made decisions on the architecture style to… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The solution is working on OpenShift, but we have the feeling the product was designed not only for OpenShift or a container-based solution to operate. In addition, they have a messy license model… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    7,159
    Comparisons
    6,169
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    369
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    3,671
    Comparisons
    3,049
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    615
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Azure Front-Door
    NGINX WAF, NGINX Web Application Firewall
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Front Door is a global, scalable entry-point that uses the Microsoft global edge network to create fast, secure, and widely scalable web applications. With Front Door, you can transform your global consumer and enterprise applications into robust, high-performing personalized modern applications with contents that reach a global audience through Azure.

    To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

    NGINX App Protect application security solution combines the efficacy of advanced F5 web application firewall (WAF) technology with the agility and performance of NGINX Plus. The solution runs natively on NGINX Plus and addresses some of the most difficult challenges facing modern DevOps environments:

    • Integrating security controls directly into the development automation pipeline
    • Applying and managing security for modern and distributed application environments such as containers and microservices
    • Providing the right level of security controls without impacting release and go-to-market velocity
    • Complying with security and regulatory requirements

    NGINX App Protect offers:

    • Expanded security beyond basic signatures to ensure adequate controls
    • F5 app‑security technology for efficacy superior to ModSecurity and other WAFs
    • Confidently run in “blocking” mode in production with proven F5 expertise
    • High‑confidence signatures for extremely low false positives
    • Increases visibility, integrating with third‑party analytics solutions
    • Integrates security and WAF natively into the CI/CD pipeline
    • Deploys as a lightweight software package that is agnostic of underlying infrastructure
    • Facilitates declarative policies for “security as code” and integration with DevOps tools
    • Decreases developer burden and provides feedback loop for quick security remediation
    • Accelerates time to market and reduces costs with DevSecOps‑automated security
    Offer
    Learn more about Azure Front Door
    Learn more about NGINX App Protect
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider25%
    Government6%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Front Door vs. NGINX App Protect and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,143 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Front Door is ranked 9th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews while NGINX App Protect is ranked 12th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 4 reviews. Azure Front Door is rated 9.0, while NGINX App Protect is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Azure Front Door writes "Provides a rich toolset for security, directing traffic, and rewriting headers and URLs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX App Protect writes "A stable system with good security and load balancing". Azure Front Door is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Amazon CloudFront, AWS WAF, Cloudflare and Akamai, whereas NGINX App Protect is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Cloudflare. See our Azure Front Door vs. NGINX App Protect report.

    See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

    We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.