We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Azure Monitor vs Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is quite stable.""Azure Monitor is very stable.""The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds.""We like this searchability and availability of the data.""Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis.""The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use.""Provides an overview and high-level information.""The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."

More Azure Monitor Pros →

"The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product.""For the system environment, SiteScope can be useful.""Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Pros →

Cons
"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring.""In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs.""The process of implementation needs to be easier.""Lacks information including details related to where problems lie.""There are a lot of things that take more time to do, such as charting, alerting, and correlation of data, and things like that. Azure Monitor doesn't tell you why something happened. It just tells you that it happened. It should also have some type of AI. Environments and applications are becoming more and more complex every day with hundreds or thousands of microservices. Therefore, having to do a lot of the stuff manually takes a lot of time, and on top of that, troubleshooting issues takes a lot of time. The traditional method of troubleshooting doesn't really work for or apply to this environment we're in. So, having an AI-based system and the ability to automate deployments of your monitoring and configurations makes it much easier.""The price could be lower but it is not a must.""When something goes down, we want the option to have automation in place to get it back up again as quickly as possible.""Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."

More Azure Monitor Cons →

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL.""It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking.""I would be very interested in having transaction traceability included in the product, to give us a better view of what is really going wrong in a particular method and action."

More Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: 
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we… more »
Top Answer: 
Provides an overview and high-level information.
Top Answer: 
If Azure Monitor wants to compete with other APM products in the industry, it has to stitch together the information and user flow. It also needs to provide all the information, as you get with Stock… more »
Top Answer: 
Infrastructure monitoring is the most valuable feature.
Top Answer: 
The pricing is the biggest challenge that we face. There are open-source tools that do 90% of what LoadRunner and Micro Focus tools are able to do.
Top Answer: 
The setup should be simplified. It would be helpful to have documentation on how to use this tool correctly from the beginning. I would be very interested in having transaction traceability included… more »
Ranking
Views
12,484
Comparisons
10,562
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
462
Rating
7.3
Views
2,727
Comparisons
2,021
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
610
Rating
7.3
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope
Learn More
Overview

Azure Monitor maximizes the availability and performance of your applications by delivering a comprehensive solution for collecting, analyzing, and acting on telemetry from your cloud and on-premises environments. It helps you understand how your applications are performing and proactively identifies issues affecting them and the resources they depend on.

SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.
Offer
Learn more about Azure Monitor
Learn more about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope
Sample Customers
Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Computer Software Company25%
Recruiting/Hr Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise33%
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise56%
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,327 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Monitor is ranked 8th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 9 reviews while Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is ranked 24th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 3 reviews. Azure Monitor is rated 7.2, while Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "Requires out of the box monitoring, real-time monitoring, and better network mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope writes "System resource monitoring that generates automated alerts and support tickets". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Splunk, Dynatrace, New Relic APM and SolarWinds AppOptics, whereas Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, Splunk, AppDynamics, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and New Relic APM. See our Azure Monitor vs. Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.