We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Azure Site Recovery vs. Quorum OnQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Azure Site Recovery Logo
4,495 views|3,677 comparisons
Quorum OnQ Logo
2,000 views|974 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Metallic, Infrascale, Microsoft and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It is a very stable product and very scalable.""The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up.""The solution is very easy to use.""They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."

More Azure Site Recovery Pros »

"A very high level security environment for secondary data.""The change in the way that Quorum processes data has made a tremendous improvement in backup and replication times. While the familiar interface remains, the underpinnings have been finely tuned and the speed is incredible. My large Exchange Server went from 5- to 6-hour backups down to 22 minutes.""From a disaster-recovery point of view, one of the things I really like is that I can test the virtual copy of the physical server on a test network and compare the servers side-by-side, without interfering with the production network. So I can see and make sure that the latest copy of the server is the physical copy of the server, without interfering with production.""The most useful feature is the one-click recovery.""Quorum OnQ has a good ransomware protection feature, and customer service and support were very good.""I like this product because it is easy to use.""It's easy to implement, easy to spin up, easily configurable, to drop-in appliances and network. There wasn't a lot of time needed to spin it up.""Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery."

More Quorum OnQ Pros »

Cons
"It could include more of a backup and recovery.""We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.""When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.""It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."

More Azure Site Recovery Cons »

"Better integration with cloud-based solutions like Azure and Office 365 is needed.""It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular.""Quorum OnQ can be improved by providing support for other operating systems like Ubuntu.""It feels to me like it's going to be a little bit more work than I originally anticipated when upgrading the appliance. I haven't done that yet so I can't speak from true experience, but I went through the project plan and it feels to me like there's quite a number of pieces and components and things that have to be done. Quorum is going to manage the rollout, but in starting the initial conversation there were a lot of unanswered questions""Lacks compatibility in terms of supporting other OS.""The user interface needs to be improved.""One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server.""I would like to see iSCSI support added so that NAS storage servers could be protected. We heavily utilize NAS storage and the risk there is minimal backup options. Currently, we are backing up NAS to NAS which is costly and slow. Being able to integrate NAS server backup would be the last item on my Quorum bucket list."

More Quorum OnQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."

More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support.""The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more.""When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."

More Quorum OnQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up.
Top Answer: It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication.
Top Answer: It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that… more »
Top Answer: Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery.
Top Answer: My advice is to take a look at both the on-premises and cloud offerings from Quorum. We have been using an on-premises solution but we will probably evaluate the cloud version come renewal time.
Top Answer: It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular.
Ranking
Views
4,495
Comparisons
3,677
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
412
Rating
7.5
Views
2,000
Comparisons
974
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
1,307
Rating
9.4
Comparisons
Also Known As
OnQ
Learn More
Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Quorum onQ is the global leader in 1-click instant recovery, providing full immediate recovery of your critical systems after any storage, system or site failure. It does this by automatically maintaining up-to-date, ready-to-run virtual machine clones of your physical and virtual servers stored on a dedicated appliance – clones that will transparently take over for failed servers within minutes.

Offer
Learn more about Azure Site Recovery
Learn more about Quorum OnQ
Sample Customers
Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
LCL Bulk Transport
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider18%
Media Company7%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm33%
Logistics Company25%
Healthcare Company17%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm8%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business93%
Large Enterprise7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Metallic, Infrascale, Microsoft and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Azure Site Recovery is ranked 3rd in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 4 reviews while Quorum OnQ is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery Software with 10 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 7.6, while Quorum OnQ is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Provides a seamlessly integrated recovery option for small to medium size enterprise companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quorum OnQ writes "Automatically spins up every one of the hosts after every backup and confirms the backup". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM and Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, whereas Quorum OnQ is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Dell EMC RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Zerto and Veeam Backup for Office 365.

We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.