We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CentOS Logo
11,278 views|9,920 comparisons
Ubuntu Linux Logo
13,970 views|12,332 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CentOS vs. Ubuntu Linux and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are the specification and technical guides, they are most important the security.""The solution has features that simplify adoption for non-Linux users. There is an interface that you can activate on RHEL systems, and on other Linux systems as well, so that you will get a graphical user interface instead of just a shell. It's easier for an administrator who is used to only working on Windows.""This is a very robust product that doesn't require a lot of handling. It just works.""The integrated solution approach reduces our TCO tremendously because we are able to focus on innovation instead of operations.""We find the Red Hat Satellite deployments very useful. It integrates well with other solutions.""The feature that I like the most is that we can integrate it easily with our existing infrastructure. We found that it is much easier to deploy RHEL in our environment compared to a competing distribution like Ubuntu.""I like the fact that most of the system configuration is Namespace so it's easy to get to and easy to configure, and most of it still uses text documents. Not all of it's a menu-driven-type entry. I also like the fact that it's a very standard file system layout so it's easy to navigate.""Its scalability and ease of setup and configuration are most valuable. When we have a hardware failure, we just save the configuration files, and in about half an hour, we have another server running with the same configuration. It is really easy to replace servers. This is the best feature."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Pros →

"It has minimal updates compared to other distributions.""I like its stability, performance, and usability.""The solution is easy to use but not as easy as Windows.""It has all the features of Red Hat, but you don't have to pay for the subscription.""The product offers a free community-based version.""The pricing is good. We pay a minimal fee.""Very robust and easy to work with.""Offers useful information and has good compatibility."

More CentOS Pros →

"The main feature of the solution is it has a command-line editor.""Stable and easy to use solution.""I like the fact that I can make it very secure with my own knowledge, which makes it different from Windows that does things in the background by magic, and you hope that it's secure. I like the availability of starting with Linux with totally minimal permissions for anybody and then increasing it on an as-needed basis. This is probably the most important to me.""The solution is free to use.""The trifecta comprising the solution's most valuable features consists of its stability, security and performance.""Windows needs a refresh option to refresh its screen, but Ubuntu doesn't need that. It refreshes automatically and works well.""The solution is stable and performing very well.""It is stable and modern."

More Ubuntu Linux Pros →

Cons
"I'm not sure how the support is being changed in terms of needing to pay for it. That's an area that can be improved. They should offer support without charging users for it.""Their pricing and documentation can be improved.""I'd like to see more of NCurses type menu systems in some instances. We're dealing with SUSE Enterprise Linux, they have an NCurses menu system. It's a menu system. It will write there. Even some of the higher-end Unix systems like AIX have some inner menu system where all the configuration tools are right there so your administrator doesn't have to jump through multiple directories to configure files if needed. I like the simplicity of Red Hat because it's pretty easy but having an NCurses menu when you have to get something done quickly would be nice.""The vulnerability assessment part should also be improved. We do a lot of patching regularly. They try to fix an issue very quickly, and we also end up facing bugs that are not properly documented. When releasing the general availability for a particular solution, they need to do a lot more work on their side.""It could be a bit more user-friendly. It could also be cheaper.""I would like training to be added to the subscription. It would be useful for when you have to train yourself or get a certification. There are many things that we are not using because we don't know how to use them. Having training included in the subscription would help us in learning more things and utilizing the full power of the solution.""It is mostly better than other solutions. However, it is sometimes difficult for disaster recovery, so we have to plan accordingly.""Linux overall needs improvement. They cannot go much beyond what Linus Torvalds's kernel implementation can do. I come from AIX, and there were very cool things in AIX that I am missing dearly, e.g., being able to support not only adding, but also reducing memory and number of processors. That is not supported on Linux right now, and it is the same for the mainstream file systems supported by Red Hat. There is no way of reducing a file system or logical volume. Whereas, in AIX, it was a shoo-in. These are the little things where we can say, "Ah, we are missing AIX for that.""

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Cons →

"The solution might be discontinued but I hope that IBM will continue to develop it and improve on the functionally and features.""The solution is stable, however, it could always be even more stable if possible.""The stability could always be improved.""I was using CentOS because it was very stable, and now it's not.""In the future, CentOS will no longer be compatible with Red Hat.""The YUM install manager can be improved. It is below average as compared to the other install managers. This is the only major problem that I see with CentOS. They should reduce dependency on the YUM manager.""Integration with other platforms could be improved.""The solution could improve by being more user-friendly."

More CentOS Cons →

"The biggest improvement, which is also applicable to Linux in general, with Ubuntu Linux is getting things standardized as to where you're going to put your configuration files and how they're going to work. Package names also need to be improved so that the package name doesn't have any match with configuration file systems and things like that. Ubuntu is still better than some of the others, such as Red Hat Linux or CentOS.""When you upgrade the core of this operating system, it can crash. This is the only problem I had. It needs more stable upgrades.""Limited application support compared with Windows and MacOS.""I think Ubuntu's performance is fine and so is its user interface. However, the latter is not as fancy as Microsoft Windows. It could be a bit fancier and easier to use.""Lacks the ability for disk expansion.""There is not a lot of support for applications in Ubuntu Linux. In the industry, most of the applications work for Windows and Mac. There should be better integration with applications in the future.""It could always be a bit more secure.""Ubuntu could be improved with more container integration and orchestration of those containers. We are looking to have more cloud-based solutions, like Docker, and container-based solutions, or Kubernetes-based solutions integrated with Ubuntu. Instead of going for VMs, we would like to have more container-based solutions on top of Ubuntu."

More Ubuntu Linux Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "In terms of the solution’s single subscription and install repository for all types of systems, we can have as many RHEL installations as we want because we have a specific subscription that entitles us to have as many RHEL services as we want. We pay for a subscription and with that we get RHEL and Satellite as well."
  • "Red Hat Linux is inexpensive. Linux solutions are generally inexpensive."
  • "RHEL is expensive."
  • "Because it is a subscription, you can go elastic. This means you can buy a year, then you can skip a year. It is not like when you buy something. You don't buy it. You are paying for the support on something, and if you don't pay for the support on something, there is no shame because there are no upfront costs. It changes the equation. However, we have such growth right now on the Linux platform that we are reusing and scavenging these licenses. From a business standpoint, not having to buy, but just having to pay for maintenance, changes a lot of the calculations."
  • "We have a site license on a yearly basis. Generally, we're okay with its price, but everything could be cheaper."
  • "The licensing with Red Hat is on par with other organizations like Microsoft. We have a site license, which gives us a certain number of servers, perhaps 25,000, for the type of license that we have. That works really well for us."
  • "We are an educational institution and as such, what we pay is less than the average company."
  • "It is more expensive than other vendors in terms of pricing and licensing, but because of its stability, I have to go with it."
  • More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are no licensing costs for CentOS."
  • "It is open-source, which means it is a free product. It has a one-time deployment cost."
  • "There is no license required for this solution."
  • "There is no price or licensing required — it's open-source."
  • "There are no licensing fees. CentOS is a free solution."
  • "There are no licensing fees for CentOS."
  • "We are using a subscription-based license option for CentOS."
  • "CentOS is a free solution."
  • More CentOS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
  • "It is not a very expensive solution."
  • "Ubuntu pricing is reasonable."
  • "It is open source, so it is free. There is no licensing fee."
  • "It is a free product."
  • "Ubuntu is an open-source Linux operating system that can be used free of charge."
  • "Ubuntu Linux is open-source and available to use free of charge."
  • "It is also manageable and financially affordable."
  • More Ubuntu Linux Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
    563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux is fantastic. It is an inexpensive solution that has excellent security, performance, and… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The integrated solution approach reduces our TCO tremendously because we are able to focus on innovation instead of… more »
    Top Answer: 
    RHEL is a great place to go. They have a great thing that is not very well-known, which is called the Learning… more »
    Top Answer: 
    There are zero licensing costs for the solution. There are admin costs. We run it on VMware, so there has to be VMware… more »
    Top Answer: 
    They're changing how they're working, and I really enjoy the easy updates. Now they're going to a streaming version… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Ubunto Linux is a complete Linux operating system that is freely available with both community and professional support… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The tools we are using for this project are compatible with this solution.
    Top Answer: 
    There is not a license needed for the solution. You only have to pay for technical support.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux, RHEL
    Ubuntu
    Learn More
    Canonical
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    To put your enterprise in a position to win, you have to break down the barriers that hold you back. With Red Hat Enterprise Linux, a platform with unparalleled stability and flexibility, you can reallocate your resources toward meeting the next challenges instead of just maintaining the status quo.

    For SAP workloads, Red Hat Enterprise Linux for SAP Solutions combines the reliability, scalability, and performance of Linux with technologies that meet the specific requirements of SAP workloads. It’s certified for integration with SAP S/4HANA and built on the same foundation as the world’s leading enterprise Linux platform, Red Hat Enterprise Linux.  For more information on Red Hat's portfolio of solutions for SAP workloads visit www.redhat.com/sap.

    CentOS Linux provides a free and open source computing platform to anyone who wishes to use it. CentOS Linux releases are built from publicly available open source source code provided by Red Hat, Inc for Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

    Super-fast, easy to use and free, the Ubuntu operating system powers millions of desktops, netbooks and servers around the world.
    Offer
    Learn more about Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
    Learn more about CentOS
    Learn more about Ubuntu Linux
    Sample Customers
    Travel Channel, Mohawk Industries, Hilti, Molecular Health, Exolgan, Hotelplan Group, Emory University, BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina, HCA Healthcare, Paychex, UPS, Intermountain Healthcare, Brinker International, TransUnion, Union Bank, CA Technologies
    Information Not Available
    Samsung, eBay, AT&T, Walmart, Cisco, Time Warner Cable, Bloomberg, Best Buy, Dell, Intel, Microsoft, Ericsson, Orange, Wells Fargo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Government21%
    University14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider26%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Educational Organization15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company15%
    University8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider37%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Government6%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider38%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise34%
    Large Enterprise28%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise36%
    Find out what your peers are saying about CentOS vs. Ubuntu Linux and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CentOS is ranked 7th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 20 reviews while Ubuntu Linux is ranked 4th in Operating Systems (OS) for Business with 81 reviews. CentOS is rated 8.2, while Ubuntu Linux is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CentOS writes "Relegated to a test bench, and therefore is no longer stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubuntu Linux writes "Versatile, highly-stable, and the best-supported one by the community". CentOS is most compared with Oracle Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise, Windows Server, openSUSE Leap and Oracle Solaris, whereas Ubuntu Linux is most compared with Oracle Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise, Windows Server, openSUSE Leap and Oracle Solaris. See our CentOS vs. Ubuntu Linux report.

    See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

    We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.