We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Cisco SecureX vs IBM Resilient comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco SecureX Logo
3,406 views|1,463 comparisons
IBM Resilient Logo
3,814 views|2,599 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Cynet and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One of the most valuable features is the simplicity of deploying SecureX. It's very easy to do that and then you gain very detailed visibility into everything that's going on in your network and, obviously, at the device level. There's just a wealth of information that you can pull from all of these products that are part of SecureX. You know exactly if you have an issue or not.""SecureX takes all the separate pieces of security within your company, adds in intelligence from different sites and services on the internet, and makes them work together.""Using SecureX, a tool provided by Cisco, we can easily integrate it with many of our other Cisco products such as Cisco ISE and many networking devices.""SecureX enables us to have all the threat intelligence and threat event data in one place."

More Cisco SecureX Pros →

"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers.""Its flexibility is the most valuable.""The UBA, User Behavior Analytics, is very good.""The solution is very easy to use.""It's really simple and has a flexible interface."

More IBM Resilient Pros →

Cons
"I'm not sure that I would call it a bug, but sometimes the solution is a little slow.""The automation and orchestration could be simpler. It could be that all the other parts are that easy to use so that these stick out as a negative, but that's the trickiest part for us. The workflows within the orchestration are just a bit more difficult.""For us, the biggest sticking point is that the product is not being designed for multi-tenancy use at present, from an MSP perspective.""If they could make the Cisco Umbrella piece a little bit more advanced or easier to manage, that would help. We use it for filtering and when you compare it to a normal content filter, it lacks some functionality.""what's missing right now is the multi-tenant capability."

More Cisco SecureX Cons →

"This product could be improved with better customization. This product isn't the best on the market like QRadar, but it's actually a good solution. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility.""The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions.""The initial setup is complex.""The product needs a bit more development.""Its price needs improvement."

More IBM Resilient Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For the value you get, the pricing of the solution is excellent."
  • "You can spend less money for another solution, but if you really want to have a good solution you have to pay. We are happy that we are getting such a good solution for what we are spending."
  • "The pricing is competitive, especially for education institutions. Licensing can be a little bit difficult to navigate, especially with resellers with Cisco, but for us it has been pretty easy."
  • "The product is absolutely free to any customer. As such, the only thing one must keep in mind is that as long as he already has one Cisco security product, irregardless of what that product is, SecureX is available for free."
  • More Cisco SecureX Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is very expensive."
  • "There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."
  • More IBM Resilient Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    SecureX enables us to have all the threat intelligence and threat event data in one place.
    Top Answer: 
    The product is absolutely free to any customer that already has one Cisco security product. If one only wants to make use of the security analytics, this is super easy, as set up and integration of… more »
    Top Answer: 
    This is a relatively new offering from Cisco and some time is needed for the evolutionary development of the platform. It's good that there are some third party integrations available and it would be… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The solution is very easy to use.
    Top Answer: 
    The pricing is pretty good, however, the downside is that it is not a very mature product. When a company needs a playbook, they have to create one, and then they have to pay someone for that service… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The product needs a bit more development. We've had some compatibility issues that need to be resolved. There needs to be a bit more research done into that to figure out why it won't work. For… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,406
    Comparisons
    1,463
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    1,946
    Rating
    9.3
    Views
    3,814
    Comparisons
    2,599
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    335
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    SecureX is a cloud-native, built-in platform experience that connects our Cisco Secure portfolio and your infrastructure. It is integrated and open for simplicity, unified in one location for visibility, and maximizes operational efficiency with automated workflows. Radically reduce threat dwell time and human-powered tasks to stay compliant and counter attacks.

    The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

    The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

    Offer
    Learn more about Cisco SecureX
    Learn more about IBM Resilient
    Sample Customers
    NHS, Rackspace, UNC Pembroke, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Missing Piece
    Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider52%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government4%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Energy/Utilities Company4%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise85%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft, Cynet and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: January 2022.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco SecureX is ranked 4th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 4 reviews while IBM Resilient is ranked 2nd in Security Incident Response with 5 reviews. Cisco SecureX is rated 9.2, while IBM Resilient is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco SecureX writes "Combines multiple sources of security intelligence, making it easy to correlate events in our environment with those outside of it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Resilient writes "Easy to use with good stability but needs more documentation". Cisco SecureX is most compared with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet FortiSOAR, Splunk Phantom and Microsoft 365 Defender, whereas IBM Resilient is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, ServiceNow Security Operations, Fortinet FortiSOAR and Swimlane.

    We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.