"I think recently with many people working from home, Cisco Umbrella has been very useful. For example, we can manage the device and the network when the employee is not working on the local host. Cisco Umbrella is very valuable for this kind of infrastructure."
"Cisco Umbrella is absolutely stable."
"We've found it to be stable and good for our customers."
"What we like most is security and how easy it is to integrate with other appliances."
"Cisco Umbrella is such a solution and can be implemented very fast and easy. All that we must do is redirect the DNS registers in their routers, or the active directory service of the enterprise that are going to use in Umbrella services. If you buy the service now, in two hours you are protected by the service because it's very fast to put in service."
"Stability-wise, it's good. I have never encountered any bugs."
"I have found the malware protection feature valuable. It is helpful and deliverable and is able to protect my entire organization from getting compromised. It also prevents us from visiting any malicious sites which are not visible to the users."
"Its simplicity is most valuable. I can install it and get it up and running, and it can be pervasive across my business within a business day. It is pretty simple and straightforward to install and configure. Its remit is reasonably clearly defined. When you look at solutions like Darktrace and Carbon Black, the mission objective isn't as clearly defined. Cisco Umbrella, Sophos Central, or some of the other solutions have a more standardized approach to antivirus, which includes enhanced response from the machine learning or deep learning perspective."
"The deployment process is very simple."
"This appliance gives me good visibility in the userbase and their activities."
"The most valuable feature is that we can use it as a proxy."
"It integrates well with Cisco Email Security Appliance."
"I would recommend this solution to others."
"It also has high availability."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"The security aspect of the solution, particularly the malware behind it, is excellent. That's something that really helped us out. It's not just a simple proxy that just blocks the insights of potential threats that come on behind it. They do malware detection and that helps us a lot."
"Technical support is pretty sharp and very responsive."
"It was a very easy product to install. It can be deployed very fast."
"Cisco Umbrella should introduce an on-premises device."
"In the next release, I would like to see the integration of VDI NSX with Cisco Umbrella."
"I would like to see more integration between Cisco Umbrella and Cisco DNA Center."
"In the future, they should combine some of the Cisco AMP features that they already have, for anti-malware purposes."
"It has happened in the past that Cisco Umbrella has denied us access to secure websites."
"There are cheaper solutions in the market"
"They need to improve analytics so they report on more of the specifics of user activity."
"It should have a real-time malware classification engine. It should check the malware on the website. It would be good if it had a real-time malware check for the websites because currently, it just compares the DNS queries of the blacklist. It should also have malware control over file execution and the types of files that the users are allowed to download."
"The support for this solution could be improved. We have experienced issues with their SMARTnet support system."
"The one thing I don't like about Cisco is that they are very much fragmented in terms of providing the complete solution. They keep on breaking their different feature sets into different boxes."
"This solution could be more secure."
"If a user wants to use it for other devices like mobile or smartphones, this product isn't so reliable."
"The solution needs to be more user-friendly and easier to navigate."
"Sometimes reporting is a little bit short."
"The licensing model needs to be more flexible."
"The GUI is not user-friendly, so it needs to improve or be simplified."
"The dashboards for local use could be better."
"File integrity monitoring would be very advantageous as an additional feature."
"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."
OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided byincrease the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.
For security, your network needs malware protection, application visibility and control, acceptable use policy controls, insightful reporting and secure mobility. Cisco offers this protection, all on a single platform: the Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA).
iboss is a cloud security company that enables the modern workforce to connect securely and directly to all applications from wherever they work. Built on a containerized cloud architecture, iboss delivers security capabilities such as SWG, malware defense, RBI, CASB and data loss prevention to all connections via the cloud, instantaneously and at scale. This eliminates the need for traditional network security appliances, such as VPNs, firewalls and web gateway proxies, which are ineffective at protecting a cloud-first and mobile world. Leveraging a purpose-built cloud architecture backed by 230+ issued and pending patents and more than 100 points of presence globally, iboss processes over 150 billion transactions daily, blocking 4 billion threats per day. More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies. To learn more, visit https://www.iboss.com/.
Cisco Web Security Appliance is ranked 5th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 9 reviews while iboss is ranked 9th in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 3 reviews. Cisco Web Security Appliance is rated 7.6, while iboss is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Web Security Appliance writes "We always hear from our customers that this is one of the products that they are very satisfied with". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iboss writes "Great security, pretty stable, and has potential to scale". Cisco Web Security Appliance is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway, Fortinet FortiProxy and Symantec Secure Web Gateway, whereas iboss is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Netskope CASB, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks and Zscaler SASE. See our Cisco Web Security Appliance vs. iboss report.
See our list of best Secure Web Gateways (SWG) vendors.
We monitor all Secure Web Gateways (SWG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.