We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Cisco Wireless WAN vs Ubiquiti Wireless comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The technical support we have experienced has been good.""The most valuable feature is the ease of configuration.""Our most valuable feature involves the 802.11ac, which operates at a very high level and has updated technology.""It's a reliable solution.""The security and the capabilities of the platform are the most valuable features."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Pros →

"Having dual-band is important. Having compatibility with very old equipment on certain frequencies, for example on 2.4 and 5.8.""The range is usually pretty good, which is the most important thing to use because more or less, all wireless access points are the same.""We have found the product to be scalable.""I like the simplicity, the ease of use.""The solution is easy to use and flexible.""Ubiquiti Wireless is easy to use, it's stable and flexible, and the performance is great. It is scalable as well.""The ease of the setup is one of its most valuable aspects.""It's an excellent option for small businesses."

More Ubiquiti Wireless Pros →

"The pricing of the solution could always be better.""The solution could be more stable.""We found the initial setup to be a bit complex due to the CLI commands.""Documentation is an area that needs review. It should be more dynamic and it should be easier.""The prices are high and should be reduced in order to be more competitive."

More Cisco Wireless WAN Cons →

"I would like a better explanation or better documentation on how to use the onboard spectrum analyzer.""This solution should be more robust when it comes to connectivity and improve wireless technology.""The control system can be improved by making it easier.""The range and maybe the quality of the signal can be improved. I had a feeling that the range wasn't long enough. Unfortunately, beyond a certain range, the signal was too weak. If I'm not mistaken, it must have been something like 100 or more than 100 meters, but I'm not sure. So, one improvement I wish for this equipment is to have a longer range, but that could mainly be due to the model we're using.""I would like local support from the parent company.""Could be more secure and the controller more user-friendly.""o if you are setting up any other third party product or any other different product, it sometimes can be a bit difficult. With Ubiquiti, you need to set up because you can adopt the product and that's it, where if it's not a Ubiquiti product it can sometimes be a difficult setup.""The solution should offer simpler management for guests. That would be helpful in the hospitality industry, for example."

More Ubiquiti Wireless Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It was a one time fee and there are no costs in addition to this."
  • "There is a license that is needed for the use of this solution."
  • "The pricing is good."
  • "The pricing is based on how much is ordered from the vendor and what type of discount they receive."
  • More Cisco Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product is expensive."
  • "Ubiquiti Wireless is affordable."
  • "If you do not have a big budget, you can use Ubiquiti, it is cost-effective."
  • "I like the fact that it offers enterprise features at a cheap price. If you compare it with Cisco, it has most of the features that Cisco has been offering but at a lesser price. I am satisfied with its price."
  • "The price has been fair for what I have been using it for. There is no license for this solution."
  • "There are no licensing fees for this solution, but the cost is on the higher side."
  • "This solution is cheaper compared to others."
  • "The price of the solution is high and could be cheaper."
  • More Ubiquiti Wireless Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless WAN solutions are best for your needs.
    564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    The solution does come with a price tag. It's not the least expensive option on the market.
    Top Answer: 
    The pricing of the solution could always be better. If they could work to make the costs more competitive, that would be ideal.
    Top Answer: 
    Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up and is an excellent option for small businesses, offering enterprise features for a one-time fee and no ongoing licensing fees. Ubiquiti Wireless is very… more »
    Top Answer: 
    For me, Ubiquiti was easy to install, configure, set up, and maintain, while also providing solid coverage and better handoffs between APs. This is especially relevant if you are using Apple products… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Ubiquiti Wireless offers a wide range of WLAN products. We tested their devices before ultimately choosing Cisco Meraki. Ubiquiti devices have good outdoor performance and the connection is very… more »
    out of 11 in Wireless WAN
    Average Words per Review
    out of 11 in Wireless WAN
    Average Words per Review
    Learn More
    Ubiquiti Networks
    Video Not Available
    Cisco Wireless WAN can help your business expand rapidly while making critical applications and services available when and where needed. Your business can run applications such as interactive video and TelePresence on a primary 4G LTE WWAN link, which is 10 to 15 times faster and 5 times lower latency than 3G.
    Ubiquiti Wireless is connecting Everyone, Everywhere
    Learn more about Cisco Wireless WAN
    Learn more about Ubiquiti Wireless
    Sample Customers
    Aegean Motorway, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Brunel University London, Bucks County Intermediate Unit , Chartwell School, Children's Hospital Colorado, Cisco Live Milan, City of Biel, City of Mississauga, Dundee Precious Metals, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Erickson Living, Goldcorp, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS)
    NASCAR Grand-AM, Maritime Parc, Outdoor Music Festival, British Armed Forces, Arcadia School District, Moscow - Enforta
    Top Industries
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Educational Organization8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider32%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Educational Organization6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Energy/Utilities Company18%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider39%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Educational Organization5%
    Company Size
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Small Business65%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise15%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 6th in Wireless WAN with 5 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "A reliable solution which is easy to manage, deploy and configure ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "Extremely easy to set up and has never failed on me". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium and Fortinet FortiExtender, whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium, Aruba Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM. See our Cisco Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.

    See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.

    We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.