We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs Zerto comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. Zerto and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine.""The initial setup is pretty straightforward, it's not complex."

More CloudEndure Disaster Recovery Pros →

"The solution's continuous protection is the best on the market. The ability to do the split-write, without any interruption to the production server, and the ability to roll back to any point in time you desire, are two really key features.""It's also very much faster than any other migration or disaster recovery platform we have. I work with virtualization, mostly on VMware, and I must admit that Zerto is even better than VMware Site Recovery Manager. Zerto compresses the data and it works much faster.""Since we are at a bank, there are certain protocols in place where we need to have RPO and RTO times of two hours or less. Zerto does a great job of setting those times and alerting us if those can't be met. We have our help desk actively monitoring that. It is extremely helpful that Zerto lists what is falling out of compliance in regards to RPO and RTO. It has been great in that regard.""The return to operations is the most valuable feature because it decreases the amount of time it takes us to recover.""The RTO and RPO are unparalleled. In the event you do have an issue, you can be back up and running (depending on the size of your infrastructure) within minutes. Your RTO can be 15 minutes and data loss be five minutes. I don't think that's matched by anybody else in the field.""It reduced the backup recovery time of our main backup solution by several hours. It's reduced our time because before we have to build a system and restore the data, we install the application and restore the data that took us at least a good 24 hours to do that. And now it's really minutes for us to recover our backup solution.""It works very well in terms of it providing continuous data protection. It does what it says it is going to do. We have been using it for several years, and once or twice, we had to recover a machine or files. It didn't have any problems in doing what it is supposed to be doing.""We are doing continuous data protection. It works flawlessly. Our recovery points are measured in seconds. We have all these "baby snapshots" throughout the course of the day, so we can roll a VM back to any point in time, spin it up, and away we go. We're actively using that. It works great."

More Zerto Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives.""The user interface, customer support, and the recovery time for the current customer query could use improvement."

More CloudEndure Disaster Recovery Cons →

"My only business complaint is the cost of the solution. I feel like the cost could be a tad lower, but we are willing to pay extra to get the Premium service.""They definitely have room for improvement in a couple of areas. One is role-based access control. Right now, they don't have an identity source so they use the identity of the vCenter or the VMM. If they connected to an identity source like Active Directory and allowed for granular roles and permissions, that would be an improvement.""I would like to have an overall orchestration capability that would enable you to do multiple VPGs in some sort of order, with delays in between.""There are still some pieces in testing that aren't automated. There are still some built-in scripts or workflows I wish Zerto would do out-of-the-box, versus having to PowerShell or have a vendor create it, or create it myself.""The monitoring and alerting functionality need to be improved.""One thing I would like to see, and I know that this is on their roadmap, is the ability to use long-term storage in the cloud, like in Azure or AWS, making that even more seamless. Whether it's stored in glacier or on-prem, being able to retrieve that data in a quick manner would be helpful. They're just not there yet.""When we are trying to upgrade any virtual machines, we have to stop the virtual machines that have been replicated in Zerto and then upgrade or update to the virtual machines onsite. Instead of having to do it manually, there should be some way of automating that particular function.""Certain areas were designed and work fine for VMware but are under development for Hyper-V. Eventually, all features will work for both platforms."

More Zerto Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "If it were easier to license, and to scale it out a little bit more economically, that'd be a godsend. At the end of the day, my druthers would be to have all 200 of our servers protected by this platform. But for a company our size, that stretches our IT budget and it just doesn't make economic sense."
  • "It's very equitable, otherwise you wouldn't do it. It's something that we utilize for the licenses per core as far as what we're backing up. Therefore, it's very cost-efficient as far as the licensing goes. For the amount of stuff that we're backing up and what we're utilizing it for, the licensing is not very expensive at all."
  • "There is a one-time cost for maintenance and support. We have a three-year contract that we will have to renew when those three years come up. There is also licensing on top of that for whatever product you are using it for."
  • "Zerto is more expensive than competitors, making the price difference pretty high. While it is very expensive, it's very powerful and good at what it does. The cost is why we are not leveraging it for everything in the organization. If it was dirt cheap, we would have LTR and DR on everything because it would just make sense to use it."
  • "It's not the cheapest tool, it's expensive. But it's doing a good job."
  • "I'd like to see better tiering for Zerto's pricing. We do multi-tier VMs. I don't think I should be paying a penalty and price for a tier-three VM where I don't need a really tight SLA like I do for a tier-one."
  • "Get the Enterprise Cloud license because it's the most flexible, and the pricing should come in around $1,000 per VM."
  • "This solution is far less expensive than SRM and NetBackup."
  • More Zerto Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery Software solutions are best for your needs.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    It depends on your needs.  In general CE DR could be used as a migration tool.  In fact, CE is so powerful that you can afford both tasks: migration and DR just using CE. The Migration service, as… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It does what it's purported to do, which is to provide continuous data protection. We have a five-second RPO. It's definitely doing its job.
    Top Answer: 
    Everyone knows Zerto is a little on the expensive side, but what else is there on the market that does the same thing? It is more expensive per client, for what it does, compared to a backup product… more »
    Top Answer: 
    I would like to see them continuously improve Zerto's automated functions, such as putting hosts in maintenance mode within vSphere and not having to worry as much about how Zerto is going to react… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    5,438
    Comparisons
    4,226
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    200
    Rating
    6.5
    Views
    19,081
    Comparisons
    12,880
    Reviews
    54
    Average Words per Review
    1,720
    Rating
    9.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Zerto Virtual Replication
    Learn More
    Overview

    With CloudEndure Disaster Recovery technology, business continuity and IT resilience are a click away. CloudEndure's one-touch disaster recovery solution utilizes block-level continuous replication, application stack orchestration, and automated machine conversion to ensure near-zero RPO and RTO for all applications, while reducing traditional disaster recovery expenses by over 85%.

    Zerto, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise company, empowers customers to run an always-on business by simplifying the protection, recovery, and mobility of on-premises and cloud applications. Zerto’s cloud data management and protection platform eliminates the risks and complexity of modernization and cloud adoption across private, public, and hybrid deployments. The simple, software-only platform uses continuous data protection at scale to converge disaster recovery, backup, and data mobility. Zerto is trusted by over 9,500 customers globally and is powering offerings for Microsoft Azure, IBM Cloud, AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud, and more than 350 managed service providers.

    Offer
    Learn more about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery
    Learn more about Zerto
    Sample Customers
    Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks
    United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, Spirit Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Epiq. JLL, KIND Snacks, Kingston Technologies
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Media Company28%
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Energy/Utilities Company3%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Insurance Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Government5%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise52%
    Large Enterprise37%
    Find out what your peers are saying about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. Zerto and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is ranked 49th in Backup and Recovery Software with 2 reviews while Zerto is ranked 3rd in Backup and Recovery Software with 54 reviews. CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is rated 6.6, while Zerto is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery writes "Straightforward to set up and is scalable for large nodes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zerto writes "Gives us business continuity capabilities during hurricane season and in case of ransomware". CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is most compared with Azure Site Recovery, Oracle Data Guard, Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM and Commvault, whereas Zerto is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Rubrik, Commvault and Oracle Data Guard. See our CloudEndure Disaster Recovery vs. Zerto report.

    See our list of best Backup and Recovery Software vendors, best Cloud Backup vendors, and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Backup and Recovery Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.