We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Timeline based analysis; good platform support""It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology.""The way it can connect with AWS is very useful, and the integrations are pretty good.""The user interface and the timelines they use are the most valuable features. The price model is very simple so that one can understand it easily and there are no surprises within it.""The advanced analytics has a really great overview of user behavior.""I have customers that like the EUBA functionality of it. The solution has the ability to build a session, basically. It pulls a lot of information together, for example, everything a user does in a specific timeframe. It's quite helpful."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Pros »

"Palo Alto has gotten the investigators more presence to actually go in the report because being that the platform will email the investigator that it's been assigned to, now the investigators will jump in there and start going through the review process a lot quicker.""It has an extensive list of integrations that are available out of the box which makes it easy to start.""The automation is excellent.""The automation part and the playbook creation part are awesome. The way it is responding to the customers and incidents is also very good. In the SOC environment, I guess it will carry out around 50% of the work.""The pricing is very good.""The most valuable features are the orchestration because of the way in which it coordinates the loss from all the devices and it provides us with a high-level overview of the critical log information.""The most valuable features are simplicity and ease of integration.""The solution is very reliable."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pros »

Cons
"I believe if it were more flexible it would be a better product.""We had a large volume right from the beginning and they weren't quite prepared for that. That's something that they should think about when it comes to customers that have a large volume to start off with.""Adding to the number of certifications that they have, for example, ISO 27001, would be helpful.""The organzation is rigid and not flexible in the way they operate""We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment.""They need to focus on more of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework and coverage. They claim they cover about 70 to 80%. I'm not sure if it's really quite that much, however."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Cons »

"For building automation, there is not a lot of good documentation. The documentation is there, but it is not very good from my perspective. There should be an improvement in this area. I don't see issues with anything else. In terms of new features, I have heard that other products have EBA functionality. It would be good if this functionality could be added.""The solution is very expensive.""There should be an on-premise version available for customers to have different choices.""Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners.""I would love to see more flexibility on what we can display and design on the dashboards.""In terms of improvement, it needs to be more modular. It's not. When you're working in layouts and you create specific apps within layouts, there's no portability right now in order to reuse that code across multiple layouts. I can't take a tab and say I want to use this tab on these other layouts. I have to physically go in there and recreate it from scratch, which is maddening.""The user interface could be a bit better.""When Palo Alto bought the solution, the pricing increased by 1.5 times. There's been a 50% increase, which is a lot."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They have a great model for pricing that can be based either on user count or gigabits per day."

More Exabeam Fusion SIEM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions.""There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive.""From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products.""It is approx $10,000 or $20,000 per year for two user licenses.""When I first looked at Demisto, it had a price tag of $250,000 but when we finally purchased it, it was $345,000."

More Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It's a very user-friendly product and it's a very comprehensive technology.
Top Answer: I've examined the cost and have found it to be rather reasonable. It's not overly expensive for what it offers.
Top Answer: We still have questions surrounding hardware deployment.
Top Answer: I think Swimlane is a better cost. It's small and doesn't focus on only integrating with it's own products like other XSoar competitors. 
Top Answer: It has an extensive list of integrations that are available out of the box which makes it easy to start.
Top Answer: We have a concurrent user license. The licensing is a pretty high price for a user license per year. The base product is very cheap, you can even get it for free, but the fee per user is expensive. It… more »
Ranking
Views
11,279
Comparisons
6,437
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
469
Rating
7.8
Views
10,490
Comparisons
7,822
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
500
Rating
8.4
Comparisons
Also Known As
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
Learn More
Overview

Exabeam Fusion SIEM is a cloud-delivered solution that that enables you to:

-Leverage turnkey threat detection, investigation, and response
-Collect, search and enhance data from anywhere
-Detect threats missed by other tools, using market-leading behavior analytics
-Achieve successful SecOps outcomes with prescriptive, threat-centric use case packages
-Enhance productivity and reduce response times with automation
-Meet regulatory compliance and audit requirements with ease

Demisto Enterprise delivers a complete solution that helps Tier-1 through Tier-3 analysts and SOC managers to optimize the entire incident life cycle while auto documenting and journaling all the evidence. More than 100+ integrations enable security orchestration workflows for incident management and other critical security operation tasks.

Offer
Learn more about Exabeam Fusion SIEM
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
Sample Customers
Hulu, ADP, Safeway, BBCN Bank
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise22%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise49%
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,695 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Exabeam Fusion SIEM is ranked 4th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 6 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is ranked 2nd in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 8 reviews. Exabeam Fusion SIEM is rated 7.8, while Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Exabeam Fusion SIEM writes "Good at security logging in our infrastructure but be prepared for problems if you start with a large implementation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR writes "Enables the investigators to go through the review process a lot quicker". Exabeam Fusion SIEM is most compared with Splunk, Securonix Security Analytics, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Sumo Logic, whereas Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is most compared with Splunk Phantom, IBM Resilient, Fortinet FortiSOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations and Securonix SOAR. See our Exabeam Fusion SIEM vs. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR report.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.