We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is easy to use."
"We've found the scalability to be good."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is flexibility."
"The main benefit of this product is the lifetime warranty, up to 99 years. For example, if your switch card fails after 10 years, and the hardware fails, it will be replaced with the very same switch or the equivalent model available at the time."
"The performance is good."
"It's easy to use."
"The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The solution is suitable for many types of environments, such as small businesses."
"The technical features are very good and it's very useful if you need a wireless solution."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the size of the outdoor access points. It's great and you can disguise them quite well."
"The actual wireless access points themselves are very powerful."
"Provides great coverage and performance."
"The most valuable features are the ease of deployment, the coverage that it offers, and the reliability."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."
"Tech support is good."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"It's very old-fashioned, which is why we have made the decision to replace it."
"The scalability and the support could be better."
"It should be a faster device."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right sizing."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"I would not consider this solution to be stable."
"Integration with AirMagnet, the design software, would be good because it takes the layout of a building and positions the access points accordingly, based on the areas and the construction materials."
"The solution could be more stable."
"The pricing, when compared to Ubiquiti, isn't competitive enough. If you want to have a Government or Public sector client they will ask why they should pay 200 euros if they can get something for 40 euros."
"Of course, we'd always like it to be cheaper, but that's for every product."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"They could include a firewall feature in the next release but even there it's not really necessary"
"It would be nice to some analytical features built into this solution."
"There is a license for this solution and the license is normally paid annually but this depends on the contract."
"We have been satisfied with the price."
"The solution is quite expensive. You have to pay for every node and it can get expensive fast, it is approximately £3,000 per month."
"Price wise, it is on the medium end of the scale. It could be lower."
"I find the price to be reasonable."
"We don't pay a licensing fee, we purchased the product."
"It's expensive but you get more coverage."
"This is a wonderful product for the price."
"Here in India, Ruckus is chosen often because it is priced low."
The Ruckus product portfolio of Wi-Fi, switching, IoT, LTE, software and SaaS lets you deliver a great end-user connectivity experience while reducing the amount of time you spend managing the network. And because Ruckus packs more capability into every network element, you can build that network at a lower cost per connection.
Whether your users are employees, customers, guests, residents, students, visitors, fans, or subscribers, Ruckus products are designed to enhance their experience—and yours.
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 10 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 8 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.6, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes "Provides network security, is user friendly, stable, and scalable, and has a lifetime warranty". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes "Simple to use, great for outdoor usage and easy to disguise". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cambium and Fortinet FortiWLM. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.