We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Inflectra SpiraTeam vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra SpiraTeam vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is fast and very accessible.""The initial setup and configuration are straightforward and relatively simple."

More Inflectra SpiraTeam Pros »

"I found the Kanban board to be the most useful for my needs.""The solution is good for everything, including end-to-end planning and its deployment and testing.""There are a lot of helpful features available for tracking dependencies.""I like the cloud infrastructure of Microsoft Azure DevOps.""I like the tracking and that we can monitor our velocity.""The product is easy to use and very stable.""I like the entire tool because it is a one-stop-solution for DevOps.""I like the fact that there is built-in Power BI. Both are Microsoft tools. So, you can incorporate dashboard capabilities."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Pros »

Cons
"They need to continue improving the interface with the third-party options.""It would be great if they worked more closely with other solutions. There needs to be better integration with the platform for development purposes."

More Inflectra SpiraTeam Cons »

"The user management in the solution could improve.""I think that they have some menus there that are not very well placed.""There are certain areas in Azure DevOps that are better in other products.""I would like to automate notifications on sprint planning. When we are getting to the end of sprint planning, we would be automatically notified.""There are certain features, and reporting that can only be used in PowerBI, but not directly in DevOps.""It should have security features for scanning the code and checking it for vulnerability and security. Currently, I am using other tools for this. It should also have integration with other tools to improve security.""It would be very useful if it had better integration with Microsoft Word because we would like to be able to define the priority requirement document and add it to different stages of the backlog.""Integration and plugins for other tools could better. Like if you want to integrate the DevOps with other tools that are in the market. This could be for the engineering tools to check code quality, application security tools, and DevOps dashboard tools."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"There are other solutions available that are open source and free, such as GitLab.""There is a license for this solution.""As a Microsoft Partner, you get a discount on the pricing. Licensing costs are around $80 a month for DevOps, but for Azure, it is about $200 a month.""There are additional costs for some functionality, such as increased scalability.""We purchase the solution on an annual basis.""The majority of the components are reasonably priced.""Microsoft Azure DevOps is free for up to five users and allows you to track a maximum of three projects.""The licensing costs are reasonable."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The initial setup and configuration are straightforward and relatively simple.
Top Answer: The solution is designed as a Software as a Service, a SaaS. We don't pay for anything beyond the standard fees. You don't have extras to pay for.
Top Answer: The pricing could be lower. They need to continue improving the interface with the third-party options. There is room for improvement in the interfaces with applications. They should be able to… more »
Top Answer: Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalable… more »
Top Answer: TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very… more »
Top Answer: The one thing that really stands out to me is how you can filter and how you can do your reporting and filter the tasks and everything by user.
Ranking
Views
140
Comparisons
68
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
930
Rating
9.5
Views
53,739
Comparisons
45,173
Reviews
65
Average Words per Review
502
Rating
8.1
Comparisons
Also Known As
SpiraTeam
Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps
Learn More
Overview

Need to manage your entire project lifecycle? From requirements and test cases, to tasks and code SpiraTeam has you covered. Powerful, straightforward, and flexible, SpiraTeam helps you get started fast. With SpiraTeam, manage your tasks and bugs quickly and easily, sync them with your team, and get back to developing. Integrated version control, testing (manual and automated), and customizable reporting, help you track it all.

Azure DevOps Services is a cloud service for collaborating on code development. It provides an integrated set of features that you access through your web browser or IDE client, including the following:

  • Git repositories for source control of your code.
  • Build and release management to support continuous integration and delivery of your apps.
  • Agile tools to support planning and tracking your work, code defects, and issues using Kanban and Scrum methods.
  • A variety of tools to test your apps, including manual/exploratory testing, load testing, and continuous testing.
  • Highly customizable dashboards for sharing progress and trends.
  • Built-in wiki for sharing information with your team.
Offer
Learn more about Inflectra SpiraTeam
Learn more about Microsoft Azure DevOps
Sample Customers
Cenduit, Maas Database Applications, DHHS Tasmania, Rota Yokogawa, ASI Business Solutions, ComputaCenter
Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company21%
Energy/Utilities Company19%
Financial Services Firm15%
Manufacturing Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise51%
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra SpiraTeam vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Inflectra SpiraTeam is ranked 7th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 69 reviews. Inflectra SpiraTeam is rated 9.6, while Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Inflectra SpiraTeam writes "Great technical support with excellent integration and a fairly easy initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Robust functionality, good integration, continually enhanced, and easy to scale". Inflectra SpiraTeam is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with Jira, GitLab, TFS, ServiceNow IT Business Management and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. See our Inflectra SpiraTeam vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.