We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jakarta EE Logo
4,189 views|3,595 comparisons
Spring Boot Logo
14,313 views|11,473 comparisons
Comparison Summary
Question: Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Answer: Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers users a solution that makes it easy to scale up the application to whatever degree the situation demands. The product can be used on the cloud, which allows users to truly scale their application according to their needs. With this cloud feature you can scale your application horizontally and at the same time ensure that your resources are used in the most effective way possible. Throughout the scaling process, resources are shared across the application. Instead of simply throwing ever more resources at the application as it grows, the resources that are already there will be distributed in a way that ensures that they go where they are needed. This makes it a very valuable solution for resource-conscious companies. Another aspect of the solution that makes it so valuable is its ability to create and customize applications. The design of the program is such that applications can be created to your specifications rather quickly. They can then be customized within a short time. When these abilities are combined, what results is a versatile product that saves an organization much in terms of time and resources. Ease of use means that now a company can create whatever it needs to with the minimum level of expenditure possible. Jakarta EE allows users to have different kinds of interfaces depending on the type of application that is being created. This shows an acute sensitivity to the needs of their users. There is no one-size-fits-all solution so far as they are concerned. As far as its ability to customize is concerned, though, Jakarta EE falls short of the mark set by Spring Boot. The customizations that can be added to the system slow it down and make it less effective. This is a disadvantage that makes it less likely to be employed by companies who view time as something to be carefully guarded. Conclusion: While Jakarta EE offers a competent product, Spring Boot is by far the better product.
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."

More Jakarta EE Pros →

"Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated.""I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products.""The cloud version is very scalable.""It gives you confidence in a readily available platform.""The platform is easy for developers to download.""Features that help with monitoring and tracking network calls between several micro services."

More Spring Boot Pros →

Cons
"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."

More Jakarta EE Cons →

"Having to restart the application to reload properties.""It needs to be simplified, more user-friendly.""communicationbetween different services from the third party layers or with the legacy applications needs to improve.""The security could be simplified.""I would like to see more integration in this solution.""Perhaps an even lighter-weight, leaner version could be made available, to compete with alternative solutions, such as NodeJS."

More Spring Boot Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."
  • "This is an open-source product."
  • "It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
  • More Spring Boot Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers… more »
    Top Answer: 
    1. Open Source 2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain. 3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, which… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license.
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 11 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    4,189
    Comparisons
    3,595
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    532
    Rating
    9.0
    1st
    out of 11 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    14,313
    Comparisons
    11,473
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    586
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    For many years, Java EE has been a major platform for mission-critical enterprise applications. In order to accelerate business application development for a cloud-native world, leading software vendors collaborated to move Java EE technologies to the Eclipse Foundation where they will evolve under the Jakarta EE brand.

    Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal upfront configuration of Spring. Spring Boot takes an opinionated view of building production-ready applications. Make implementing modern application best practices an intuitive and easy first practice! Build microservices with REST, WebSocket, Messaging, Reactive, Data, Integration, and Batch capabilities via a simple and consistent development experience.

    Offer
    Learn more about Jakarta EE
    Learn more about Spring Boot
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider36%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise30%

    Jakarta EE is ranked 3rd in Java Frameworks with 1 review while Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 6 reviews. Jakarta EE is rated 9.0, while Spring Boot is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jakarta EE writes "A greatly improved product with versatility in software development options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "Good security and integration, and the autowiring feature saves on development time". Jakarta EE is most compared with Spring MVC, Amazon Corretto, Vert.x, Eclipse MicroProfile and Apache Spark, whereas Spring Boot is most compared with Eclipse MicroProfile, Apache Spark, Open Liberty, Oracle Application Development Framework and Vert.x.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.