"The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."
"It is good at requirements management and test management."
"The work item feature is most valuable. It allows us to store all product requirements. We can also link the test cases to those requirements so that we know which feature has already been tested, and which one is waiting for testing. We can also couple the code reviews, unit tests, and automated tests into these requirements. It is reliable. It has all the features and good performance. It also has reporting tools or analysis tools."
"The most valuable feature is the backlog."
"The most valuable feature is simplicity."
"It's is a very stable solution."
"Good branching and labelling features."
"The solution is very much stable."
"Basically, the capacity to construct various products is something I find handy."
"As far as queries are concerned, creating, grading, or customizing the queries as a primary requirement is very easy to do."
"The initial setup could be better, it's complicated."
"I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"It has been really dated. When you start to work more in an agile environment, it is not really that flexible. They tried to replicate the look and feel of Jira, but it is not quite there. It was nice to use in the past, but it is not as flexible now with the changing development environments and methodologies."
"The execution of test cases could stand improvement."
"This solution is quite old and it is already being bundled as Azure DevOps Server."
"The interface can be improved and made more user-friendly."
"The usability of TFS is not that great."
"They should have design patterns in TFS for the development team, and design patterns for the QA."
"The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."
Jama Connect is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while TFS is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 17 reviews. Jama Connect is rated 6.6, while TFS is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "Reasonably priced, stable, user-friendly, and has good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "Good traceability for managing workflows, but not flexible enough for agile environments". Jama Connect is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, Polarion Requirements, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation and Helix ALM, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software and Visual Studio Test Professional. See our Jama Connect vs. TFS report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.