We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jama Connect Logo
3,248 views|2,515 comparisons
TFS Logo
Read 17 TFS reviews.
16,718 views|13,942 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface.""It is good at requirements management and test management."

More Jama Connect Pros →

"The work item feature is most valuable. It allows us to store all product requirements. We can also link the test cases to those requirements so that we know which feature has already been tested, and which one is waiting for testing. We can also couple the code reviews, unit tests, and automated tests into these requirements. It is reliable. It has all the features and good performance. It also has reporting tools or analysis tools.""The most valuable feature is the backlog.""The most valuable feature is simplicity.""It's is a very stable solution.""Good branching and labelling features.""The solution is very much stable.""Basically, the capacity to construct various products is something I find handy.""As far as queries are concerned, creating, grading, or customizing the queries as a primary requirement is very easy to do."

More TFS Pros →

"The initial setup could be better, it's complicated.""I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."

More Jama Connect Cons →

"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on.""It has been really dated. When you start to work more in an agile environment, it is not really that flexible. They tried to replicate the look and feel of Jira, but it is not quite there. It was nice to use in the past, but it is not as flexible now with the changing development environments and methodologies.""The execution of test cases could stand improvement.""This solution is quite old and it is already being bundled as Azure DevOps Server.""The interface can be improved and made more user-friendly.""The usability of TFS is not that great.""They should have design patterns in TFS for the development team, and design patterns for the QA.""The user interface could be improved to make it simpler and increase usability."

More TFS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost seems very competitive with other offerings."
  • More Jama Connect Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is reasonable at this time."
  • "TFS is more competitively priced than some other solutions."
  • "We pay subscription fees on a yearly basis and the price is reasonable."
  • "I wouldn't say that this tool is cheap or expensive but in the middle."
  • "We are using the open-source version."
  • "The price of the solution is cheaper than other competitors and it is a per-user license."
  • "We pay for the license yearly."
  • "I am not in a position to comment on the licensing terms, as we are talking about an enterprise arrangement."
  • More TFS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    It is good at requirements management and test management.
    Top Answer: 
    The initial setup could be better, it's complicated. They could be better. In my perception, they are slow to move on feature improvements.
    Top Answer: 
    We use Jama Connect for requirements management, test management, and some attempts to utilize it to store documents, despite the fact that it was not designed for that use.
    Top Answer: 
    TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The solution is very much stable.
    Top Answer: 
    I am not in a position to comment on the licensing terms, as we are talking about an enterprise arrangement. I am not part of that.
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    Team Foundation Server
    Learn More
    Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation.
    Visual Studio Team Foundation Server (TFS) is the collaboration platform at the core of Microsoft's application lifecycle management (ALM) solution. TFS supports agile development practices, multiple IDEs and platforms locally or in the cloud and gives you the tools you need to effectively manage software development projects throughout the IT lifecycle.
    Learn more about Jama Connect
    Learn more about TFS
    Sample Customers
    Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University
    Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
    Top Industries
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. TFS and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jama Connect is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while TFS is ranked 6th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 17 reviews. Jama Connect is rated 6.6, while TFS is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "Reasonably priced, stable, user-friendly, and has good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "Good traceability for managing workflows, but not flexible enough for agile environments". Jama Connect is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, Polarion Requirements, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation and Helix ALM, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software and Visual Studio Test Professional. See our Jama Connect vs. TFS report.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.