We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"The interface is very user-friendly."
"It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"The solution is very customizable according to business needs."
"It's great for helping users deal with their supply chain."
"It's a mature product."
"I often say that PeopleSoft's greatest feature is how customizable it is."
"A solid and mature product."
"The recruiting is most valuable. It saves time in having easy and fast applicants tracking as well as candidates' contact plus pipeline management."
"PeopleSoft is a good core system. It has a lot of functionality. They frequently update the solution and recently they have added some good enhancements features for higher education. We just switched to the new fluid interface and that is working very well for us is very good."
"The PeopleSoft interface is very good."
"The solution is easy to scale, expand and make bigger."
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation."
"The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"PeopleSoft should be more flexible with the configuration. There should be less coding and more configuration."
"Tools and UI could be enhanced."
"The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP."
"I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it."
"Scalability is not there in PeopleSoft. Its performance and resilience are also very bad. When you're trying to stretch it, it breaks. It is not resilient. It is also not stable. It is stable as far as data is concerned, but the infrastructure is not stable."
"Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."
"The API integration could be better."
"There can occasionally be complexity in the initial setup."
"It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%."
"There is an annual license for this solution."
"The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP."
"The price of the solution is not cheap. However, it is priced average amongst competitors."
"There are no additional costs for licensing."
"We are a University and the cost and license are negotiated privately."
"The main issue we have with the solution is that it is very expensive."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 6 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 4th in ERP with 12 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.6, while PeopleSoft is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "User-friendly, flexible and easy to customize, and offers good support for different industries". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Mature with a variety of features and multiple use cases". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with Oracle E-Business Suite, JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle ERP Cloud and NetSuite ERP, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle ERP Cloud and SAP HCM. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. PeopleSoft report.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.