We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. PeopleSoft

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. PeopleSoft and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible.""I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing.""The interface is very user-friendly.""It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the customer.""We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne.""The solution is very customizable according to business needs."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Pros »

"It's great for helping users deal with their supply chain.""It's a mature product.""I often say that PeopleSoft's greatest feature is how customizable it is.""A solid and mature product.""The recruiting is most valuable. It saves time in having easy and fast applicants tracking as well as candidates' contact plus pipeline management.""PeopleSoft is a good core system. It has a lot of functionality. They frequently update the solution and recently they have added some good enhancements features for higher education. We just switched to the new fluid interface and that is working very well for us is very good.""The PeopleSoft interface is very good.""The solution is easy to scale, expand and make bigger."

More PeopleSoft Pros »

Cons
"Financial side could be expanded by bringing in things like the IMS.""We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task.""I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries.""They have been improving it every day, but it could have more automation.""The flexibility of workflows and multi-industry implementation support should be improved.""The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Cons »

"PeopleSoft should be more flexible with the configuration. There should be less coding and more configuration.""Tools and UI could be enhanced.""The area that could be improved is the upgrade process, it's not the easiest. Oracle stopped supporting our version. So we have to move either to the cloud or work in a non-supported situation. That was certainly a disadvantage. That's also the reason why we decided not to stay with Oracle. Now we are moving to SAP.""I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it.""Scalability is not there in PeopleSoft. Its performance and resilience are also very bad. When you're trying to stretch it, it breaks. It is not resilient. It is also not stable. It is stable as far as data is concerned, but the infrastructure is not stable.""Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved.""The API integration could be better.""There can occasionally be complexity in the initial setup."

More PeopleSoft Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that you pay every year, which is typically about 20%.""There is an annual license for this solution.""The licensing is for mid-market businesses, where it is cheaper than Oracle Cloud, EBS, or SAP.""The price of the solution is not cheap. However, it is priced average amongst competitors."

More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There are no additional costs for licensing.""We are a University and the cost and license are negotiated privately.""The main issue we have with the solution is that it is very expensive."

More PeopleSoft Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It is highly configurable. You have a choice in terms of how you want to run it. You can run it in your own data center, in a private cloud, or in a public cloud. The choice is really up to the… more »
Top Answer: It depends on the number of users and the modules that you want to buy. It is licensed on a perpetual license basis. You buy the license costs upfront, and then there is maintenance for support that… more »
Top Answer: Make sure that you have the right strategy on whether you're going to support it internally or you're going to hire an external vendor for it. It needs a specialized skill set; it is not something… more »
Top Answer: Although both are solutions to manage HR, their differences make each one suitable for different companies. Oracle Cloud HCM is a platform for connecting all human resource processes in your… more »
Top Answer: The solution is easy to scale, expand and make bigger.
Top Answer: The main issue we have with the solution is that it is very expensive. This is an issue when it comes to tabulating the many tariffs which exist in Mexico. The calculating of the taxes in Mexico is an… more »
Ranking
6th
out of 54 in ERP
Views
7,426
Comparisons
6,066
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
584
Rating
8.5
4th
out of 54 in ERP
Views
10,896
Comparisons
8,980
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
553
Rating
7.8
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Oracle's JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is an integrated applications suite of comprehensive enterprise resource planning software that combines business value, standards-based technology, and deep industry experience into a business solution with a low total cost of ownership. EnterpriseOne is the first ERP solution to run all applications on Apple iPad. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne also delivers mobile applications.
Oracle's PeopleSoft applications are designed to address the most complex business requirements. They provide comprehensive business and industry solutions, enabling organizations to increase productivity, accelerate business performance, and provide a lower cost of ownership.
Offer
Learn more about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Learn more about PeopleSoft
Sample Customers
TechNova Imaging Systems (P) Ltd, Jordan Petroleum Refinery, Hosun Universal Co. Ltd., Grupo Corporativo Papelera SA de CV, Label Technology Inc., Uniwax S.A., Al Jaber Group, SOMAR Corporation, SICIM S.p.A.,
BMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company22%
Construction Company17%
Retailer11%
Manufacturing Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company5%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
REVIEWERS
University13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Financial Services Firm10%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise43%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise61%
Find out what your peers are saying about JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. PeopleSoft and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 6th in ERP with 6 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 4th in ERP with 12 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.6, while PeopleSoft is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "User-friendly, flexible and easy to customize, and offers good support for different industries". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Mature with a variety of features and multiple use cases". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with Oracle E-Business Suite, JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle ERP Cloud and NetSuite ERP, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, Oracle ERP Cloud and SAP HCM. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. PeopleSoft report.

See our list of best ERP vendors, best Activity Based Costing Software vendors, and best Demand Management vendors.

We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.