We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

KVM vs Oracle VM VirtualBox comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
KVM Logo
Read 8 KVM reviews.
65,581 views|59,169 comparisons
Oracle VM VirtualBox Logo
35,956 views|30,602 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about KVM vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"If you prefer command-line, there are all kinds of command-line options.""Good screen and keyboard sharing feature.""Very cost-effective.""This solution is open source and easy to configure.""I like that it's easy to manage. It's also more powerful when it comes to security than others. That point of view is the one consideration. The other consideration is that it's cost-effective.""It is easy to use, stable, and flexible. It is a pretty mature product, and it is faster than VirtualBox.""The GUI interface makes the management of KVM easier than ever before.""KVM is stable."

More KVM Pros →

"The snapshot feature is very powerful; it protects us from disaster.""The solution is very convenient and easy to use.""Oracle VM VirtualBox is easy to use.""It's a pretty good product in terms of monitoring.""The solution has high performance and is easy to use.""Technical support is good.""This product is very user-friendly and easy to use.""The pause feature is valuable. I can pause, which is something that not all hypervisors allow. The snapshot feature is also valuable."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox Pros →

Cons
"Business continuity features need to be added.""In our setup, we do not have any dashboards or orchestration, and it is hard to manage. We have 25 gig network cards, but the software driver we have only supported 10 gigs.""There are some issues with the graphics and some software that is very complex.""One thing that maybe could be improved is making it easier to scale. It needs to be more clear on how to scale the storage space for virtual machines.""Its resource usage can be improved.""Technical support could be better. In the next release, I would like to see an improved user interface and dashboard. This type of improvement will make it easy or help our engineers understand the solution from a requirement point of view.""Monitoring and resolution could be improved.""Lacks high availability across clusters as well as support for Apache CloudStack."

More KVM Cons →

"When I select the Ubuntu operating system from within the virtual machine, it sometimes hangs.""The solution needs to improve the methods used for starting and stopping the machine.""The memory and hardware usage could be a little bit lighter. Right now, it's quite heavy on the usage. The CPU usage should be lower.""I find the solution to be incredibly unstable, constantly falling over and not working properly.""It has some issues when you have some weird device drivers. For instance, when you have a weird sound driver working on your machine, and the VirtualBox needs to output the sound of the virtual machine into the sound driver of the physical machine, the bare metal, it doesn't work too well. If you tweak lots of drivers and play around with the different kinds of drivers and machines, you will probably break something. I have not played with it too much and maybe it already supports it, but it would probably be good to have the ability to use a container from the virtual machine environment instead of spinning off a complete virtual machine. There are other tools for that. On Linux, you have a DXE, LXC framework, and you have Docker as well. Docker is good because it is multi-platform, and you can run Docker on pretty much anything, even different processors, but it would be good if we had a VirtualBox running on it while spinning off containers instead of full virtual machines. The other thing that will become important, and I'm pretty sure that they are thinking about it as well is that there's this new hardware platform that Apple is releasing, which is an ARM-based new chip. So, VirtualBox will probably have to work on ARM-based CPUs as well.""The solution could be more user-friendly.""Oracle VM VirtualBox is not flexible, It's not like VMware.""The AI and the UI could be improved. The user interface is a little outdated and the AI is not very attractive."

More Oracle VM VirtualBox Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is free for everyone."
  • "The price is fair compared to others. But in our local market, it's a problem to get budget approval from management. That's why they are trying to get those products so we can give them the price benefit. But if you consider the international market or other products, it's sometimes better than their price."
  • "We had some problems with the licensing."
  • More KVM Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is pretty good for the price, which is free."
  • "This is an open-source product and it can be used free of charge."
  • "There are no licensing fees."
  • "The license I use is free."
  • "The solution is free."
  • More Oracle VM VirtualBox Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Virtualization Software solutions are best for your needs.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    KVM scales better, orchestration better, performs better and supports a wider range of hardware and, also, you can implement at ZERO cost and with a very powerful web interface for management, from… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Small support team, small cluster, low core count, use VMware products Large support team, large clusters with many cores, use KVM. KVM scales better, orchestration better, performs better and… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Far from being an expert, my opinion is that the positive sides of KVM are: Lower costs and open-source which gives the abilities to customize it according to the specific needs of each customer.
    Top Answer: 
    KVM is easy to use, stable and flexible. It is mature and very fast. It is an affordable open-source solution that is easy to set up and manage. It offers very good security. It has a virtual manager… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    65,581
    Comparisons
    59,169
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    411
    Rating
    7.4
    Views
    35,956
    Comparisons
    30,602
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    385
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    KVM
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V). It consists of a loadable kernel module, kvm.ko, that provides the core virtualization infrastructure and a processor specific module, kvm-intel.ko or kvm-amd.ko.

    Oracle VM Virtualbox is a cross-platform virtualizer for x86 servers and desktops, and is also for embedded usage. With this product, you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine, all at the same time, making it a powerful tool to test, develop, demonstrate and deploy solutions.

    Oracle VM Virtualbox is a professional solution that is also freely available as Open Source Software. It is for both enterprise and home use. This x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization software is high performing and rich in features. 

    Oracle VM Virtualbox currently runs on Windows, Linux, Solaris and Macintosh. It also supports many guest operating systems, such as Windows, DOX/Windows 3. Linux, OS/2, OpenBSD, Solaris and OpenSolaris.

    For more information on Oracle VM VirtualBox, visit Oracle.com

    Offer
    Learn more about KVM
    Learn more about Oracle VM VirtualBox
    Sample Customers
    MediaWiki, Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikidata, Wikiversity, Commons
    Airbus, Colorado State University, SCS Africa, Wolf Medical Systems.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Aerospace/Defense Firm25%
    Energy/Utilities Company25%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider38%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Government6%
    Educational Organization4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    University12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider39%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise30%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise29%
    Find out what your peers are saying about KVM vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    KVM is ranked 3rd in Server Virtualization Software with 8 reviews while Oracle VM VirtualBox is ranked 7th in Server Virtualization Software with 10 reviews. KVM is rated 7.4, while Oracle VM VirtualBox is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of KVM writes "Stable, easy to set up, and very easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle VM VirtualBox writes "A free and versatile open-source solution that supports multiple platforms and is easy to set up". KVM is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, VMware vSphere, Oracle VM and RHEV, whereas Oracle VM VirtualBox is most compared with Proxmox VE, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere, Oracle VM and Citrix Hypervisor. See our KVM vs. Oracle VM VirtualBox report.

    See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.

    We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.