We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Meraki MX Logo
38,174 views|32,571 comparisons
Sophos XG Logo
43,955 views|36,450 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Meraki MX vs. Sophos XG and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Meraki makes it easy to be secure and know where the holes are to fix them. We have been fixing anything that we have ever found for 20 years. We keep up-to-date with firmware upgrades. We just try to stay on top of everything for security, like maintaining updates and getting rid of old systems. I feel like we're on top of it.""They have very good technical support and I have relied heavily on them.""It is easy to manage, which is one of the most important things for us. It is also flexible, stable, and scalable.""The most valuable feature is that we didn't have any problems with Meraki MX.""It has very good features; it's easy to use, configure, set up, and deploy.""Meraki MX offers advanced filtration options, plus it behaves like a router and a firewall at the same time.""It has the most advanced security features, for example, layer 3 and layer 7 firewall capabilities and the end team and IPS protection. It also has IPS, and it has very good functioning of cloning services. You don't actually have to touch the device. If you have multiple companies in different countries, you don't really require this device to be touched. You can get it delivered directly to any office of a country, and then you can simply put your configuration over the cloud. It's very simplified and easy to manage. It gives a very good granular visibility about your network. Earlier, a lot of things were lacking in the network. We were unable to identify where the problem was, but after implementing Meraki MX, we are able to dig down and identify where is the problem. We can easily and quickly identify the sources and the root causes of the issues.""In general, Meraki MX is easy to work with."

More Meraki MX Pros »

"We've had good experiences with technical support.""The initial setup is very straightforward and the solution is extremely user-friendly.""The product offers many great features.""Overall, this is a good product and I would recommend it for small to mid-sized customers.""Sophos is a comrehensive solution which allows me to configure all the attendant products, such as Sophos' firewall, Endpoint and Encryption features.""The simplicity of the setup is the most valuable feature.""I recommend the solution due to its ease of use and pricing.""What we found valuable is the way they deal with emails, as well as the way the bandwidth usage is shown."

More Sophos XG Pros »

Cons
"Meraki tech support staff have a lot more visibility into your network than you do, which is frustrating at times. I understand the approach is to keep the dashboard easier to understand. This will frustrate more advanced users at times.​""The whole Cisco Meraki range requires easier access for cameras. For a security center, it would be helpful to have easier access to cameras through the portal. Its licensing cost could also be better.""We have been having a problem with the VPN. When the energy goes down and is back again, the VPN link doesn't get established. We have to manually turn off the modems and other pieces of equipment and manually establish the VPN. It has been around one month since we have been having this problem, and we don't have enough support from Meraki to solve the problem.""Management can be improved in Meraki MX.""It would be nice if the different services, including the SIEM SOC and endpoint detection and response (EDR) were integrated into one, so that I don't have to go to different vendors for different services.""They need to improve the link between Meraki and Active Directory.""From the improvement perspective, we need more monitoring capabilities. We want to have full-based access visibility, such as, what is happening when something is trying to reach and it is denying. We cannot see some parts of it. The integration of active directory with this product is not very fruitful. It has some bugs or lacks in the functionality of active directory integration. We are unable to identify where exactly and whether it has really applied our policy.""As far as what needs to be improved — nothing really comes to mind. It does what we need it to do."

More Meraki MX Cons »

"In the Firewall, the Intrusion Prevention System can be improved.""Inability to investigate incidents, there is no tracking.""In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to the policy and simplify the policy-making, as the complexity of it makes it really tough.""The weakest point is the technical support because they are difficult to get into contact with.""It would be better if they made their own hardware like Palo Alto and Fortinet. They use their own ASICs and claim it is more secure.""The manuals or guides we are given are too simple. When we are implementing the product, it is difficult for us as we don't have more detailed information.""The interface could be simplified and diagnostic system graphs improved.""Content filtering could be more effective and efficient."

More Sophos XG Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The license cost depends on the box. We acquired a different product line. We are dealing with MX appliance now, that is, MX6, MX54, MX100, MX250, MX450. Every box has got an identity, and it has got its own specification. Every box has got a different license fee. We deployed Meraki MX in UAE when it was not a mature product. We took a risk, but we were successful. We saved a huge amount of money after implementing and removing all the MPLS and leased lines. We got a broadband connection because Meraki MX could work on a broadband connection. We have drastically saved a very good amount of money, which was one of the successful things apart from the successful solution.""We just have to pay for the product and the license. We have a license for three years, and it is renewed every three years. It costs $1,200 for three years for one endpoint. Meraki had a good promotion for remote workers or remote workforce. The discount is very good. This promotion continues till the next fiscal year of Cisco.""​Other content filtering solutions that I have used had more bells and whistles, but given the cost, complexity, and management overhead, I am very pleased with Meraki’s solution.""The price could be lower, but compared to the TCO of other products, it's not really that expensive.""It is a good global solution in terms of the price and features, but because we sell this solution in dollars, sometimes we don't get to sell this solution in Brazil because the dollar is very expensive. The price of every project is different. It varies depending upon the project, scenario, and client.""Its licensing cost could be better.""Like any Cisco product, the license is really expensive for small business clients. It needs to be cheaper. If you look it up, you might go, "That doesn't make any sense."""The price is slightly increased, but reasonable."

More Meraki MX Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We paid for our licensing for three years, upfront, and there are no costs in addition to the standard fees.""Over the last two years of the COVID-19 crises, most users required an SSL VPN license, something for which SonicWall charges but which Sophos offers for free.""The Sophos pricing, in general, is better than SonicWall, Fortinet, WatchGuard, or anybody else.""I paid for a license for the solution for three years costing approximately $11,000. Additionally, I received the Web Appliance fee for paying for the full licencing.""This is a budget-friendly product with reasonable pricing.""I don't think that it is expensive when you compare it with other solutions available on the market.""The price can be a bit steep but for the number of features, it is worth it.""We generally buy it for a three-year license."

More Sophos XG Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Threat Management (UTM) solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:  Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) software is the operating software for the Cisco ASA suite. It supports network security and firewall options. We researched both Meraki and ASA. We liked… more »
Top Answer: Its ease of configuration and management is very useful for us and for other companies that don't have an onsite IT person. It is easy to configure and easy to manage. It is easy to configure the VPN… more »
Top Answer: We just have to pay for the product and the license. We have a license for three years, and it is renewed every three years. It costs $1,200 for three years for one endpoint. Meraki had a good… more »
Top Answer: Hi, This really gets to two things: - how fast your internet access is and how much are you planning to grow in the next few years?  - are you planning to do the TLS inspection? Do proper… more »
Top Answer: Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls have both great features and performance. I like that Palo Alto has regular threat signatures and updates. I also appreciate that I can just import addresses and URL… more »
Top Answer: Sophos UTM is no longer being developed, according to our reseller. All the development effort is going into XG. So XG will be the only Sophos firewall going forward, UTM will eventually be end of… more »
Ranking
Views
38,174
Comparisons
32,571
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
668
Rating
8.3
6th
out of 47 in Firewalls
Views
43,955
Comparisons
36,450
Reviews
94
Average Words per Review
454
Rating
8.1
Comparisons
Also Known As
MX64, MX64W, MX84, MX100, MX400, MX600
Learn More
Overview
With the proliferation of modern applications and mixed-use networks, host and port based security is no longer sufficient. Cisco Meraki's layer 7 "next generation" firewall, included in MX security appliances and every wireless AP, gives administrators complete control over the users, content, and applications on their network.

Sophos XG Firewall is next gen firewall that is optimized for today’s business, delivering all the protection and insights you need in a single, powerful appliance that’s easy to manage.

Offer
Learn more about Meraki MX
Learn more about Sophos XG
Sample Customers
Hyatt, ONS
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider31%
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Financial Services Firm13%
Non Tech Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company20%
Government5%
Construction Company4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider40%
Computer Software Company18%
Government6%
Media Company4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business56%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise21%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business40%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise38%
REVIEWERS
Small Business64%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business49%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise26%
Find out what your peers are saying about Meraki MX vs. Sophos XG and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Meraki MX is ranked 1st in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 17 reviews while Sophos XG is ranked 6th in Firewalls with 115 reviews. Meraki MX is rated 8.4, while Sophos XG is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Meraki MX writes "Makes it easy to stay on top of everything for security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos XG writes "Light and stable with excellent real-time control ". Meraki MX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA Firewall, Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and SonicWall NSa, whereas Sophos XG is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, pfSense, Sophos UTM, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and WatchGuard Firebox. See our Meraki MX vs. Sophos XG report.

We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.