We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and HTML. So many other tools do not recognize this specific proprietary protocol. Using TruClient, we can still create scripts that cover everything that we need to cover.""The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.""The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way.""The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center.""The fact that the solution supports multiple protocols such as open source, VuGen, TruWeb, TruClient, and SAP is very important because these protocols help us to concentrate on what is really needed to produce performance tests. If something is not supported, you have to use other tools or find other ways of assimilating loads.""The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I"

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pros →

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pros →

Cons
"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud.""We are trying to put it into a complete CI/CD pipeline, but there are still some challenges when you try to run it through different protocols. The challenges are around how you can containerize applications. There are some limitations to some protocols, such as desktop. And when it comes to database testing, there are some things that we can't do through CI/CD.""I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check.""I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point.""There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other.""Improvements to the reporting would be good."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Cons →

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."
  • "We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."
  • More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    The TruClient feature is the most valuable for us. An application with testing can only be scripted using TruClient, so it's part web-based, but it also has its own protocol combined with HTTP and… more »
    Top Answer: 
    We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000. I don't think there are any additional costs to standard licensing.
    Top Answer: 
    Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    4,946
    Comparisons
    3,322
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    805
    Rating
    8.0
    10th
    Views
    3,021
    Comparisons
    2,010
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    344
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
    OATS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is a simple, smart and scalable cloud-based load and performance testing solution for agile and DevOps teams. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions.

    Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.
    Offer
    Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
    Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
    Sample Customers
    Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
    Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Educational Organization40%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Retailer20%
    Engineering Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company39%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Government6%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise58%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 4th in Performance Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 10th in Performance Testing Tools with 1 review. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is rated 8.0, while Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud writes "Enabled us to eliminate load generators, and automatically triggers and produces reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Easy to use, good central test repository, and responsive technical support". Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter, Apache JMeter and IBM Rational Quality Manager, whereas Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Apache JMeter and Automation Anywhere (AA).

    See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.