We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Micro Focus UFT Developer vs SoapUI Pro comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. SoapUI Pro and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Integrates well with other products.""This tool is really good. We don't need to write any code, but it writes the code itself, only record and play. And it is simple, and it is not heavy; I mean, it doesn't have a large footprint, and it works well for us.""The most valuable feature is stability.""The most valuable feature for UFT is the ability to test a desktop application.""The cost is the most important factor in this tool.""The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases.""The most valuable feature is the Object Model, where you can directly pull up the object as a global or a local.""The most valuable features are the object repository."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pros →

"One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful.""The solution offers excellent integration capabilities.""It's a very simple solution to use.""The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature.""Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours.""The interface is user-friendly.""It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly.""The solution scales well."

More SoapUI Pro Pros →

Cons
"Integration with other tools can become a costly exercise.""It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding.""Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful.""UFT Developer is good, but it requires high-level development skills. Scripting is something that everybody should know to be able to work with this product. Currently, it is very development intensive, and you need to know various scripting languages. It would be good if the development effort could be cut short, and it can be scriptless like Tosca. It will help in more adoption because not every team has people with a software engineering background. If it is scriptless, the analysts who wear multiple hats and come from different backgrounds can also use it in a friendly manner. It is also quite expensive.""The pricing could be improved.""I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability.""In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable.""In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Cons →

"If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating.""There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users.""The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user.""It is limited to scope and risk services only. It does have some support for JMS, but it is not out-of-the-box; you have to do some tweaks here and there.""Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang.""Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy.""SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts.""Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

More SoapUI Pro Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."
  • "When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."
  • "It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."
  • "The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."
  • "Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."
  • More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."
  • "My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."
  • "The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."
  • "We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."
  • More SoapUI Pro Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    The issue with all the integration is that it can become very costly and expensive and we'd like to be able to recommend one single tool that will do it all.
    Top Answer: 
    One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really… more »
    Top Answer: 
    They have a partnership with my company. I believe it is essentially a year. They don't go monthly.
    Top Answer: 
    In the beginning—I think it may have been the prior version—there was a lot of lag, but as the version updated, the lag decreased. SoapUI would also benefit from some more customization abilities… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    Views
    5,322
    Comparisons
    3,783
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    623
    Rating
    7.2
    8th
    Views
    8,264
    Comparisons
    6,953
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    689
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
    SoapUI NG Pro
    Learn More
    Overview

    Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.

    For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
    Offer
    Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Developer
    Learn more about SoapUI Pro
    Sample Customers
    Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
    Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Insurance Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Logistics Company15%
    Consumer Goods Company8%
    Leisure / Travel Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business3%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise76%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise86%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise5%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. SoapUI Pro and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 10 reviews while SoapUI Pro is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews. Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 7.2, while SoapUI Pro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Great features with good stability and an easy initial setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoapUI Pro writes "Has out-of-the-box database support and can be easily used by non-technical staff ". Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Silk Test and Visual Studio Test Professional, whereas SoapUI Pro is most compared with ReadyAPI, Postman, Parasoft SOAtest and Apache JMeter. See our Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. SoapUI Pro report.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.