We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution can scale to fit any requirement.""We have not explored the desktop performance analysis of the file storage, but the user interface, API, and the response that we receive over the file storage are very good. We have a lot of customers that connect to the client-side, click the images, and upload them. The beauty of the solution is that we can mount the file storage into a critical server as well as an external drive. The speed that we receive with the images is pretty good.""Integration with the entire Azure platform.""It was quick to synchronize back from Azure to the on-premise server.""The initial setup is fairly easy.""The interface is very good.""General user familiarity with Office 365 products make adopting this solution easy to adopt in production."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

"The interface is good.""Replication and performance tuning are valuable features.""It's a scalable product."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Pros →

Cons
"Microsoft Azure File Storage is not that scalable. Once you reach the boundaries, you need to migrate to another solution.""The pricing could be improved. They need to make the costs more transparent so users know what they will be charged and why ahead of time.""In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity.""The storage account key could be a security issue.""The initial setup is complex. Unless you have done it a few times it, it is going to be hard.""The solution should support all the legacy storage systems.""Lacks integration with other platforms."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined.""They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment.""It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."

More Oracle Database Backup Service Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."
  • "Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."
  • More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It was quick to synchronize back from Azure to the on-premise server.
    Top Answer: 
    For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month; but we are using the solution at a basic level with standard storage (HDDs and not SDDs). It has been difficult to understand the… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Replication and performance tuning are valuable features.
    Top Answer: 
    Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing cost.
    Top Answer: 
    I think deployment of the solution could be streamlined quite a bit. It takes quite an effort when you're bringing it up cold. Patch management could also be streamlined and simplified, keeping up to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    11,967
    Comparisons
    10,648
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    748
    Rating
    7.6
    Views
    1,053
    Comparisons
    971
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    514
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

    Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

    Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

    Offer
    Learn more about Microsoft Azure File Storage
    Learn more about Oracle Database Backup Service
    Sample Customers
    Talon, Camden
    Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Comms Service Provider16%
    Media Company9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise33%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 2nd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 15th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 3 reviews. Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 7.6, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "A cloud file storage solution that plays well with familiar products but is difficult to configure and build-out". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "Scales well, is easy to install, and has good support". Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Azure NetApp Files, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3 and Wasabi, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Amazon S3 Glacier and Azure NetApp Files. See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.