We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The solution is easy to use, flexible, and customizable."
"The vertical covers all aspects of functionality and integrates easily with the existing Office products."
"The customer support is good. The first level of support agent in every case was able to solve the problem very quickly."
"Our data is much more manageable than before."
"Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities."
"I have found the flexibility to be very valuable. It's highly flexible, and at least for us, it has been effective. It is also highly functional."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV is brilliant and it's a different segment when comparing it with Dynamics AX. Dynamics AX is a larger product with much more features and it's aimed at a different segment of the market."
"Great finance modules and customization."
"It's highly customizable."
"EBS has lots of application families and lots of features. It is modular in deployment and flexible enough to let the customer increase the built-in capabilities and enable new applications when needed. These are very important things at hand in case there will be a need to expand the product capabilities and/or implement new projects."
"The most valuable feature is its flexibility."
"The solution is good for small businesses."
"It is scalable."
"The complete product suite is good. The financials are good, it is the best product I've been working with is Oracle Financial. Supply chain manufacturing is very comprehensive and the connectivity, between all the modules, is seamless. They are all communicated well with one another."
"This software scales very well across various implementations."
"It would be nice if the integration process was easier."
"Some of the control aspects such as auditing can definitely be improved. For example, auditing is not very easy, and the user permissions are complicated."
"The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements."
"We need to customize more often than we would like."
"I am hoping there is more integration with other platforms, more features, and customization in the next release."
"In Thailand, the support here could be better. The process to get an answer is too long."
"The solution is not best suited for larger-scale businesses."
"Customization and costs could be improved."
"Oracle E-Business Suite uses an old technology (Forms), which is Java-based."
"One issue with the product is because it build on a lot of older technologies, there is a substantial technical debt in the system."
"Earlier when our organization was small they chose Oracle because in the telecommunication industry everybody was using Oracle. Our company has grown to a size where our particularly billing phase has created some challenges and now we are looking at alternate solutions. There is not a billing engine or module that you can buy from Oracle that can be added to this EBS solution to fix our problem. They should add a billing module or engine to the solution."
"User interface is outdated and not user friendly."
"They don't have built-in bank integrations, which would be very helpful."
"We don't like Oracle EBS because it is very old. Nowadays, all the systems are on the cloud and web-based. With Oracle EBS, you need a huge setup before installing it. You need a lot of servers. There are a lot of problems and bugs in the system. We have to move from Oracle EBS to another system. In terms of improvements, it can have better training for end users and better support."
"It is difficult to get answers from technical support right away."
"In the future, Oracle E-Business Suite could improve by having a better UI. Competitors are providing much better interfaces."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"I have some subscription-based customer and a few customers who have perpetual licenses that hosted the application on the cloud."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"The first time we tried to buy the newest version, it was expensive."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV has a pay-as-you-use payment model."
"I think the pricing is the best; it's cost effective for sure."
"Licensing and costing of Oracle EBS is very complex. We recommend to use a system integrator during the negotiation process since Oracle sales representatives sometime do not know the actual minimum requirements and may oversell the necessary licenses through ignorance."
"Considering the market at the moment, Oracle needs to adjust the pricing of this solution."
"The price would be better if it were lower."
"Both the current projects and future projects should be defined well. Licensing should be done according to current and near future plans."
"Oracle's licenses are not straightforward."
"This product is more expensive if you compare it to SAP."
"Licensing is on a yearly basis. There is an initial cost, and the standard fee is 22% per year."
"In order to minimize the implementation and consultancy costs, business lines should have proper definitions. They need to have a proper way of retrieving their data, which should be structured well."
Microsoft Dynamics NAV is ranked 7th in Activity Based Costing Software with 8 reviews while Oracle E-Business Suite is ranked 1st in Activity Based Costing Software with 25 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics NAV is rated 7.8, while Oracle E-Business Suite is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics NAV writes "Very well integrated but the area of customizations could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle E-Business Suite writes "Highly scalable: Supports scale-out architecture". Microsoft Dynamics NAV is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, SAP S4HANA, IFS Applications and Infor M3, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, PeopleSoft, Oracle HCM Cloud, Oracle ERP Cloud and Oracle CPQ Cloud. See our Microsoft Dynamics NAV vs. Oracle E-Business Suite report.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.