We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Microsoft products are very good in general. This product is flexible, easy to use, intuitive, and has good capabilities."
"The solution is easy to use, flexible, and customizable."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV is brilliant and it's a different segment when comparing it with Dynamics AX. Dynamics AX is a larger product with much more features and it's aimed at a different segment of the market."
"Our data is much more manageable than before."
"The vertical covers all aspects of functionality and integrates easily with the existing Office products."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The customer support is good. The first level of support agent in every case was able to solve the problem very quickly."
"I have found the flexibility to be very valuable. It's highly flexible, and at least for us, it has been effective. It is also highly functional."
"The accounting part and the procurement part are most valuable. It is a very good system with workflows and notifications."
"Some of the control aspects such as auditing can definitely be improved. For example, auditing is not very easy, and the user permissions are complicated."
"The solution is not best suited for larger-scale businesses."
"I am hoping there is more integration with other platforms, more features, and customization in the next release."
"There is a lot of improvement needed in the top model, such as better integration with logistics, quality management, and data modeling for all revenue types."
"It would be nice if the integration process was easier."
"In Thailand, the support here could be better. The process to get an answer is too long."
"We need to customize more often than we would like."
"The performance and virtual machine backup is not good with this solution and need improvements."
"Its implementation process is kind of complicated. If the person implementing it doesn't know what he is doing, the system can have many issues. Sage X3 is just an accounting system. As compared to Oracle E-Business Suite, it does not cover a lot of functionality. It doesn't have the payroll, lease management, and HR modules. Oracle E-Business Suite is better than Sage X3."
"Microsoft Dynamics NAV has a pay-as-you-use payment model."
"The first time we tried to buy the newest version, it was expensive."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"I have some subscription-based customer and a few customers who have perpetual licenses that hosted the application on the cloud."
"The price of the solution is reasonable."
"I think the pricing is the best; it's cost effective for sure."
"It is very cheap. There are no additional charges, but the problem is that you have to acquire an additional supporting system such as a budgeting system. You will have to implement the integration and maintain two systems. So, you need to pay for the license of that budgeting system and this one. You also need to pay the license for the payroll and integration. There are all these integrations that you have to pay for."
Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management delivers faster, simpler, and more flexible business management at a fraction of the cost and complexity of typical enterprise ERP systems.
Microsoft Dynamics NAV is ranked 7th in Activity Based Costing Software with 8 reviews while Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is ranked 9th in Activity Based Costing Software with 1 review. Microsoft Dynamics NAV is rated 7.8, while Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics NAV writes "Very well integrated but the area of customizations could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management writes "A stable, scalable, and inexpensive solution with workflows, notifications, and fast support". Microsoft Dynamics NAV is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, SAP S4HANA, IFS Applications and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, whereas Sage Business Cloud Enterprise Management is most compared with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, SAP ERP, SAP Business ByDesign, IFS Applications and SAP S4HANA.
We monitor all Activity Based Costing Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.