We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Oracle Application Testing Suite vs SmartBear TestComplete comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pros →

"In TestComplete, I saw a conformed package of a tool that kept everybody in consistency. The team was able to regenerate further tests without having to manipulate more code because the record feature is great.""It is very easy to maintain tests with this tool. It covers all necessary items in the test plan. The most painful item in testing is maintenance. When changes occur, the tests should be maintained.""The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.""Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.""The solution has a very nice interface.""The most valuable features are the desktop and mobile modules.""When compared to other tools, it is very simple.""Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pros →

Cons
"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Cons →

"Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.""The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools.""In the cross-browser domain, it has a few snags with Microsoft Edge and Chrome; although, these problems are not critical.""There could be API interfaces with this tool.""If that engine could better identify more XPaths automatically and make the process more flexible, that would be better.""Right now, when you buy the solution, you need to pay for one solution. You receive one set up and you install it and it's just in that one machine. It would be ideal if they could offer one subscription where you can connect to different machines with a group subscription.""Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.""The licensing costs are a little bit high and should be reduced."

More SmartBear TestComplete Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."
  • "The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000."
  • "The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive."
  • "Our ROI is about $10,000 a year."
  • "The pricing is a little above average — it could be lower."
  • "It costs a few hundred per year, but I am not sure. It is not at all expensive as compared to other tools."
  • "We have a TestComplete 12 license."
  • More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    When compared to other tools, it is very simple.
    Top Answer: 
    When we try to automate and keep the same script in a few cases, it fails due to control changes. You must have a session open when running in TestComplete, otherwise, your script will fail. When… more »
    Ranking
    21st
    Views
    3,021
    Comparisons
    2,010
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    344
    Rating
    9.0
    5th
    Views
    13,713
    Comparisons
    9,813
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    512
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OATS
    Learn More
    Overview
    Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

    TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

    Offer
    Learn more about Oracle Application Testing Suite
    Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
    Sample Customers
    Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries
    Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company39%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Government6%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise50%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
    563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 12 reviews. Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 9.0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Easy to use, good central test repository, and responsive technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Speed, configuration consistency, and accuracy of tests with fantastic results". Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Micro Focus UFT One, Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus UFT One, Ranorex Studio and Appium.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.