We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. SoapUI Pro

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
6,149 views|3,365 comparisons
SoapUI Pro Logo
8,293 views|6,949 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros »

"The interface is user-friendly.""The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature.""Using SoapUI's automation suites to run all our test cases saved us a lot of time. Running 300 test cases takes about three to four days. When you automate all that, it takes only two to three hours.""The most valuable features are that it is user-friendly, it's easy to use and easy to teach to others.""It clearly makes it easy to test APIs based on the SOAP protocol. We are a logistics company, and we have lots of tracking calls coming in. We provide APIs for tracking services, and it makes sense for us to use SoapUI to test them thoroughly.""It's a very simple solution to use.""One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful.""The solution scales well."

More SoapUI Pro Pros »

Cons
"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons »

"SoapUI would benefit from some more customization abilities. It's a good interface, but it would be nice if they added the ability to build custom dashboards where the user can do their own bar graphs and pie charts.""If the load and bare minimum could be defined, I would give this solution a higher rating.""Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy.""The documentation needs to be improved because the interface is not easy for a first-time user.""It is limited to scope and risk services only. It does have some support for JMS, but it is not out-of-the-box; you have to do some tweaks here and there.""Occasionally, when you are saving, the solution can hang.""We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs.""Stability has been an issue for us. It needs to be looked at and made a bit better."

More SoapUI Pro Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member.""The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees.""The cost is not that bad.""My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years.""I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

More SoapUI Pro Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally.
Top Answer: From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly. Some aspects were difficult and therefore less useful for us, perhaps we lack the coding knowledge on that.
Top Answer: We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and… more »
Top Answer: One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really… more »
Top Answer: They have a partnership with my company. I believe it is essentially a year. They don't go monthly.
Top Answer: In the beginning—I think it may have been the prior version—there was a lot of lag, but as the version updated, the lag decreased. SoapUI would also benefit from some more customization abilities… more »
Ranking
23rd
Views
6,149
Comparisons
3,365
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
458
Rating
7.0
9th
Views
8,293
Comparisons
6,949
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
658
Rating
8.1
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAtest
SoapUI NG Pro
Learn More
Overview
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.
For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
Offer
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Learn more about SoapUI Pro
Sample Customers
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm11%
Manufacturing Company9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm23%
Logistics Company15%
University8%
Consumer Goods Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise68%
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise65%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while SoapUI Pro is ranked 9th in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0, while SoapUI Pro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoapUI Pro writes "Has out-of-the-box database support and can be easily used by non-technical staff ". Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SonarQube, Postman, Coverity, Tricentis Tosca and ReadyAPI, whereas SoapUI Pro is most compared with ReadyAPI, Postman, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Tosca and Katalon Studio.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.