We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

RadView WebLOAD vs Selenium HQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
RadView WebLOAD Logo
2,142 views|1,021 comparisons
Selenium HQ Logo
13,386 views|11,829 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.""The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

More RadView WebLOAD Pros →

"The solution is very easy to implement.""The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations.""We can run multiple projects at the same time and we can design both types of framework, including data-driven or hybrid. We have got a lot of flexibility here.""The testing solution produces the best web applications.""The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open-source, has a good interface, and integrates well.""The grids, as well as the selectors, are the most valuable features.""The stability of the solution has been good, it is reliable we have not had any bugs.""The solution is very easy to use. Once you learn how to do things, it becomes very intuitive and simple."

More Selenium HQ Pros →

Cons
"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options.""Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."

More RadView WebLOAD Cons →

"The installation could be simplified, it is a bit difficult to install.""Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be.""Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code.""Whenever an object is changed or something is changed in the UI, then we have to refactor the code.""There should be standardized frameworks to build automation.""It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements.""The latest versions are often unstable.""It would be better if it accommodated non-techy end-users. I think it's still a product for developers. That's why it's not common for end-users, and especially for RPA activities or tasks. It's hard to automate tasks for end-users. If it will be easier, more user-friendly, and so on, perhaps it can be more interesting for this kind of user."

More Selenium HQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We purchased a license for two years."
  • "It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."
  • More RadView WebLOAD Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We are satisfied with the pricing."
  • "It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost."
  • "This is an open-source product so there is no cost other than manpower."
  • "It is all free."
  • "Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
  • "Selenium is open-source."
  • "Selenium is a free tool."
  • "Selenium HQ is open source and our use of it in our company is provided for free."
  • More Selenium HQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The solution is very easy to implement.
    Top Answer: 
    The solution is open-source and free to use. There are no licensing costs.
    Ranking
    13th
    Views
    2,142
    Comparisons
    1,021
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    597
    Rating
    5.5
    3rd
    Views
    13,386
    Comparisons
    11,829
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    629
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SeleniumHQ
    Learn More
    Radview
    Video Not Available
    SeleniumHQ
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

    Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

    1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
    2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
    Offer
    Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
    Learn more about Selenium HQ
    Sample Customers
    GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
    BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm57%
    Healthcare Company29%
    University14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Retailer13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Large Enterprise90%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise42%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
    563,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    RadView WebLOAD is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 26 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6, while Selenium HQ is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Highly customizable and the best tool out there to do automated testing". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and Visual Studio Test Professional, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Worksoft Certify, Tricentis Tosca, Appium and Micro Focus UFT One.

    We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.