"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting."
"The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."
"The solution is very easy to implement."
"The most valuable features are ExpectedConditions, actions, assertions, verifications, flexible rates, and third-party integrations."
"We can run multiple projects at the same time and we can design both types of framework, including data-driven or hybrid. We have got a lot of flexibility here."
"The testing solution produces the best web applications."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open-source, has a good interface, and integrates well."
"The grids, as well as the selectors, are the most valuable features."
"The stability of the solution has been good, it is reliable we have not had any bugs."
"The solution is very easy to use. Once you learn how to do things, it becomes very intuitive and simple."
"The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."
"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved."
"The installation could be simplified, it is a bit difficult to install."
"Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be."
"Selenium uses a layer-based approach that is somewhat slower than Eggplant when it comes to executing code."
"Whenever an object is changed or something is changed in the UI, then we have to refactor the code."
"There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."
"It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements."
"The latest versions are often unstable."
"It would be better if it accommodated non-techy end-users. I think it's still a product for developers. That's why it's not common for end-users, and especially for RPA activities or tasks. It's hard to automate tasks for end-users. If it will be easier, more user-friendly, and so on, perhaps it can be more interesting for this kind of user."
Earn 20 points
WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.
Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:
RadView WebLOAD is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Selenium HQ is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 26 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6, while Selenium HQ is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Highly customizable and the best tool out there to do automated testing". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter and Visual Studio Test Professional, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Worksoft Certify, Tricentis Tosca, Appium and Micro Focus UFT One.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.