We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

RadView WebLOAD vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about RadView WebLOAD vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The most valuable feature of this solution is reporting.""The most valuable aspect is that the IDE is simple and it's quick to complete the process."

More RadView WebLOAD Pros →

"The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.""It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools.""The stability is okay.""The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pros →

"Technical support is slow and wastes a lot of time, so it needs to be improved.""The reporting side of things is really complicated. It's difficult to get out exactly what you're looking for, there are almost too many options."

More RadView WebLOAD Cons →

"LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.""We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""The SAP area could be improved.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We purchased a license for two years."
  • "It costs $8,600 yearly and we have the Cloud, which is an additional $800. Our perpetual license is $800 and then the Cloud functionality with our 500 users is the $8,600."
  • More RadView WebLOAD Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."
  • "Its licensing cost is very less."
  • "NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees."
  • More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools.
    Top Answer: 
    NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees.
    Top Answer: 
    The SAP area could be improved. Not the GUI applications, SAP log-on, or something like that. We can see features and use NeoLoad properly in all the normal SAP log-on areas. I haven't tried it, but I… more »
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
    Learn More
    Video Not Available

    WebLOAD is an enterprise scale load testing product that powers the most demanding performance experts in the world. WebLOAD supports hundreds of technologies. DevOps teams will feel right at home with WebLOAD's flexible built-in scripting capabilities.

    The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

    Learn more about RadView WebLOAD
    Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
    Sample Customers
    GoDaddy, Praxair, DeVry University and the College Board.
    Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
    Top Industries
    Financial Services Firm57%
    Healthcare Company29%
    Computer Software Company30%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Individual & Family Service11%
    Computer Software Company34%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    Small Business10%
    Large Enterprise90%
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Find out what your peers are saying about RadView WebLOAD vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,643 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    RadView WebLOAD is ranked 13th in Performance Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 8 reviews. RadView WebLOAD is rated 5.6, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of RadView WebLOAD writes "Good reporting, but the developers need the ability to write their own code ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". RadView WebLOAD is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, BlazeMeter, Selenium HQ and Micro Focus UFT Mobile, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood, BlazeMeter and Tricentis Tosca. See our RadView WebLOAD vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

    See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.