We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Red Hat Ceph Storage vs. VMware vSAN

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Ceph Storage Logo
25,881 views|21,636 comparisons
VMware vSAN Logo
59,501 views|48,644 comparisons
Featured Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The configuration of the solution and the user interface are both quite good."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Pros »

"Storage is expandable with no extra cost.""Easy to deploy and manage.""It uncoupled the idea of proprietary technology and component capabilities. It is basically a proprietary technology for a cost-effective infrastructure.""It has a single pane of glass for management and operational control, which is the most valuable feature. The integrated storage is also valuable.""Good performance, reliable and agile.""Very good VCG notification feature.""This product has very good performance when it comes to virtualization storage and works well with solutions such as SAP HANA, Exadata, Hadoop, and Big Data Analytics.""I have found the solution to be scalable."

More VMware vSAN Pros »

Cons
"The management features are pretty good, but they still have room for improvement."

More Red Hat Ceph Storage Cons »

"The interface is a little complicated, it could be simplified with more graphical gadgets. We have many servers, and the built-in functions, such as rate configuration, are a bit complex.""The price can be reduced. Small businesses cannot afford this solution.""The integration could be improved. I would like to see integration with other platforms.""They can package it in a way that is specific to the hardware infrastructure and the hardware platform. It should stay fairly up to date with the drivers and the manufacturer issues. The problem with uncoupling the proprietary technology and component capabilities is that by uncoupling them, you run into some concerns or challenges over the poor performance model. These concerns really come when you start talking about high performance, high bandwidth, and high availability types of environments. While vSAN is a leader, in a critical view, it is not about being cost-effective. It is more about the immediate impact of money loss to the business in critical applications where we want to maintain a continuous operational 59 model. It is, however, good for QA/QC tasks. I don't necessarily know how it works in regards to VDI or virtual desktop infrastructure.""Disaster recovery needs to be improved, when there is a crisis, there is a problem with what is the quickest way to get out of it.""More focus has to be put on deduplication and compression with a hybrid architecture.""I think it needs to be more cost-effective. I would also say that even though the capacity is good, there is also room for improvement there. Also, they could improve the security of the system.""The ability to access SAN environments with fiber channels (or even NVMe) would be a good addition."

More VMware vSAN Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I would like to use more advanced models of the solution but the price needs to be reduced. There are some extra costs for this solution including a license.""The price of vSAN could be lower.""For a classical node plus storage solution, the price is higher.""The price is expensive.""It is expensive, but you get what you pay for.""We pay for a license to use the solution through our company CapEx and then we continue to pay annually.""Enterprise customers can customize their licenses according to their own needs and budget.""If they could reduce the cost, it would be better. Licensing costs are something that they could take care of. If you are a smaller and strong IT team, then VMware vSAN is a very good product. If you want to expand in the service provider space, then you will have to go for an open-source solution like OpenStack. We are now looking at OpenStack because we sell licensing costs. We are a service provider, so the IT component data is a substantial component in our overall costing. We feel that OpenStack might help us to cut down the licensing cost. Therefore, we are looking at SAS storage instead of vSAN. SAS is open source, but it is not wise to have open source without having the backend support. We are using RedHat SAS, and it is an open-source solution. You can also have a free version, but we are using it with support from RedHat so that we have somebody to back us up in case we have a problem. If you do normal business, then IT expense is 1% or 2% of the total turnover. The higher licensing costs sometimes don't make difference to the big companies who are not service providers and are using it only for their internal use. For them, the IT cost is 1% or 2%, but for an IT service provider, the IT costs will go up to 15% to 16% of the total cost of the operations. This is where the licensing costs become irrelevant. For example, the licensing cost of using VMware, VC, and vSAN is 8% of my monthly revenue. Every month, I pay about $35,000, and, with the revised plan, it will be something like $50,000 or revenue of 600k per month, which means almost 8% of the revenue is going into VMware licensing. In a very competitive world, 8% as a cost element is huge. So, if I can bring it down to 2%, I save 6% in revenue expenditure. In terms of profit, 6% of 30% is something like another 25% increase in my profit. My profit can be almost 25%. It would be 20% to 25% in case I am able to handle the licensing costs and bring them to a very low level. Because these IT costs are substantial for us, that is why we are going with OpenStack. OpenStack has a limitation that it requires more hardware. There will be some increase in the hardware cost, but overall we will save 5% to 6% of our licensing cost by using OpenStack."

More VMware vSAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Software Defined Storage solutions are best for your needs.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, easy… more »
Top Answer: While both run on the vSAN technology from VMware, vSAN needs to be deployed on vSAN ready nodes while VxRail is an engineered system. The choice to choose which technology depends on two major… more »
Top Answer: We found the reduced power consumption with Nutanix Acropolis AOS a very attractive feature. We also like the interface that allows you to talk directly to your VM from the present software. We found… more »
Top Answer: HPE SimpliVity is a hyper-converged infrastructure solution that is primarily geared to mid-sized companies. We researched VMware vSAN but found HPE was a better option for us. HPE SimpliVity has… more »
Ranking
Views
25,881
Comparisons
21,636
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
230
Rating
7.0
2nd
Views
59,501
Comparisons
48,644
Reviews
47
Average Words per Review
412
Rating
8.3
Comparisons
Also Known As
Ceph
vSAN
Learn More
Overview
Red Hat Ceph Storage is an enterprise open source platform that provides unified software-defined storage on standard, economical servers and disks. With block, object, and file storage combined into one platform, Red Hat Ceph Storage efficiently and automatically manages all your data.

VMware vSAN is the industry-leading software powering Hyper-Converged Infrastructure solutions.

What vSAN Does

  1. Enables you to evolve without risk. Seamlessly extend virtualization to storage with an integrated hyper-converged solution that simply works with your overall VMware environment and reduces the risk in digital transformation by using existing tools, skillsets and solutions.
  2. Lowers total cost of ownership by 50% or more with capital and operational savings. Reduce storage CapEx, decrease operational costs, manage the day-to-day operations of compute and storage infrastructure, and accelerate responsiveness to traditionally time-consuming tasks.
  3. vSAN helps customers scale to tomorrow. Prepare for tomorrow's dynamic business in the multi-cloud era with a solution designed to utilize the latest storage and server technologies and ready to support a wide range of applications, from current business critical applications to next-gen applications using containers.
Offer
Learn more about Red Hat Ceph Storage
Learn more about VMware vSAN
Sample Customers
Dell, DreamHost
Read Some Case Studies At Home Cloud CaribCINgroupDiscovery Check out the Rest of our Customer Stories Here
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company27%
Manufacturing Company7%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company13%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider23%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise47%
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise49%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise12%
Large Enterprise69%

Red Hat Ceph Storage is ranked 6th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 1 review while VMware vSAN is ranked 2nd in Hyper-Converged (HCI) with 53 reviews. Red Hat Ceph Storage is rated 7.0, while VMware vSAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat Ceph Storage writes "Excellent user interface, good configuration capabilities and quite stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSAN writes "Gives us a lot of advantages when we need to expand resources". Red Hat Ceph Storage is most compared with MinIO, Portworx Enterprise, IBM Spectrum Scale, Dell EMC ECS and Nutanix Acropolis AOS, whereas VMware vSAN is most compared with VxRail, Nutanix Acropolis AOS, Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct, HPE SimpliVity and Dell EMC PowerFlex.

See our list of best Cloud Software Defined Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Software Defined Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.