We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I was looking for software as a service rather than having issues with managing hardware, upgrades, updates. I was trying to step away from that. Those were the key factors when looking at Securonix as a full-feature SIEM with next-generation capabilities available."
"There aren't any positive aspects of the solution. It was a complete failure. There are no redeeming features."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is their analytics platform where they have the open security data-link, which they introduced. This is typically different from the other vendors."
"The solution is stable and scalable."
"Customer support and making sure that we're successful has been one of the best features, one that we weren't even looking for during evaluation, but that's what we have found."
"The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great."
"The solution appears to be stable, although we haven't used it heavily."
"This is a good security product."
"We would like to see better integration with other products."
"The pricing. I'm not sure how they are proceeding with the identity based pricing compared with DB pricing which most of the vendors are using today."
"There is slight room for improvement in terms of the initial deployment. What I see is that Securonix is more focused on their product. They are expanding, in a big way, the number of customers. So there has to be a number of dedicated teams to jump on and speed up the deployment process."
"Some of the user experience when doing threat-hunting, such as being able to see multiple types of analytics from different log sources in one view, would be beneficial. Right now, there are some limitations around that."
"We thought they were going to be a great product, however, they're actually not great at all as an MSP."
"Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes."
"The price of Splunk UBA is too high."
"I'm not aware of any lacking features."
SNYPR is a next-generation security analytics platform that transforms big data into actionable security intelligence. Built on a Hadoop big data security lake, SNYPR combines an open data model, log management, security incident and event management (SIEM), user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) and fraud detection into a complete, end-to-end platform that can be deployed in its entirety or in flexible, modular components.
Securonix Security Analytics is ranked 3rd in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 6 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 6th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews. Securonix Security Analytics is rated 8.0, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Securonix Security Analytics writes "The solution has helped by reducing the number of false positives in half". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Stable, with good automation capabilities, however, we want to be able to automate even more". Securonix Security Analytics is most compared with Splunk, Exabeam Fusion SIEM, IBM QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Devo, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch, Exabeam Fusion SIEM, ELK Elasticsearch and LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA. See our Securonix Security Analytics vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.
See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.
We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.