We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Silk Performer vs Tricentis NeoLoad comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Silk Performer Logo
1,060 views|711 comparisons
Tricentis NeoLoad Logo
6,269 views|3,692 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."
  • "Its licensing cost is very less."
  • "NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees."
  • More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer: 
    I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools.
    Top Answer: 
    NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees.
    Top Answer: 
    The SAP area could be improved. Not the GUI applications, SAP log-on, or something like that. We can see features and use NeoLoad properly in all the normal SAP log-on areas. I haven't tried it, but I… more »
    Ranking
    16th
    out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    1,060
    Comparisons
    711
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    6,269
    Comparisons
    3,692
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    566
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
    Learn More
    Overview

    Test Asset reusability for performance monitoring
    Silk Performer can considerably speed up testing cycles by allowing you to reuse your existing functional tests. Use Silk Test® or Selenium for performance testing and synthetic monitoring purposes as well.

    Cloud in
    Integrated scalability from the Cloud
    Silk Performer load testing enables your applications for 'battle readiness' that can withstand massive, global usage. Easily simulate any size peak-load and avoid costly investments in stress testing hardware and setup.

    Retina scan
    Monitor user experience with advanced diagnostics
    Detect, isolate, and resolve performance issues with effective end-to-end diagnostics. Design scripts to uncover errors from the user’s perspective and analyze results with easy to read visual reporting.

    Monitor
    A leading web support for load and stress testing
    Validate performance of your most complex web applications and efficiently create comprehensive tests that reflect real world conditions and usage patterns.

    Comprehensive mobile performance testing
    Lower the cost and complexity of testing mobile web and mobile native applications at scale. Silk Performer provides a complete set of profiles for all popular mobile devices, application types, and connection speeds.

    The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

    Offer
    Learn more about Silk Performer
    Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
    Sample Customers
    University of Colorado, Medidata, Monash University
    Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company37%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government9%
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer17%
    Government17%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Individual & Family Service11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Micro Focus, Tricentis and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: January 2022.
    564,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Silk Performer is ranked 16th in Load Testing Tools while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 8 reviews. Silk Performer is rated 0.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Silk Performer is most compared with Apache JMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, Tricentis Flood, BlazeMeter and IBM Rational Performance Tester.

    See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.