"The interface is easy to navigate."
"As far as queries are concerned, creating, grading, or customizing the queries as a primary requirement is very easy to do."
"It's is a very stable solution."
"The most valuable features are the dashboard and task-selection capability."
"The traceability is valuable. While managing the workflows, it was always nice to have that traceability from requirements and all the way through design. It integrates with Microsoft Test Manager, and you can have everything that is related to a requirement attached to it."
"The most valuable feature is the backlog."
"I feel that the test plan and test tools are more manageable in TFS."
"Basically, the capacity to construct various products is something I find handy."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"The stability has always been very good."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"It is very easy to use. You can handle a lot of things together at once in one package, which is a good point for us."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"The project management side should be addressed and the project and release planning should be somewhat extended."
"They should have design patterns in TFS for the development team, and design patterns for the QA."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"The usability of TFS is not that great."
"Currently, we are looking for a solution with which we can incorporate third-party development sites or third-party project teams into the system. Because it is on-premise, it is a bit problematic because we need to have a VPN or something else in the system. A cloud-based solution would be better for us, and that's what we are looking for. Our biggest problem is the external connection, which, of course, is limited by our own IT. It would be good to have some kind of publishing service for this external connection. It might be there, and it might be that our IT is making it impossible for us. Its template editor could be easier to use. Currently, customizing the project templates according to your needs requires some work."
"The interface can be improved and made more user-friendly."
"There should be management of the project built-in."
"The execution of test cases could stand improvement."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"One of the problems with this solution is you need to be highly technically skilled to operate it, it is not for everyone."
"It needs more integration with other tools for monitoring. Microsoft also needs to make it more modern to make it work with microservices and the cloud. It is a bit outdated currently."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"The solution is quite expensive."
TFS is ranked 2nd in Test Management Tools with 17 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 3rd in Test Management Tools with 8 reviews. TFS is rated 7.8, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of TFS writes "Good traceability for managing workflows, but not flexible enough for agile environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Offers lots of features, including memory analysis and code sharing". TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center and TestRail by Gurock, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Tricentis Tosca, HCL AppScan and Micro Focus UFT Developer. See our TFS vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.