Dell EMC NetWorker Room for Improvement
Consultant, Backup Systems at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
The integration of the web API should be improved. There has been new functionality added to the API but it should be easier to understand.
The Backup module should be improved, especially the functionality for SharePoint and SQL Server. We are having issues when we are trying to backup up Microsoft applications, and it happens when the data is very large. For example, our database is 19 terabytes and this is very large for NetWorker, so it runs slowly. We are not able to tune it and segment it. If it were a file system, then we could split it into smaller pieces. In cases like this, it is very fast. However, because we are not able to divide it, the backup is slow. This is one area that can be improved because often, people don't need to take a full backup. Sometimes, then just want a snapshot of some data.
The capability of incremental backups should be included. As it is now, when DD Boost tries to compare the current backup with the previous one, it has trouble with the large versions and it can take three to four days. They cannot perform an incremental backup using VSS technology for SharePoint or MS SQL Server. Definitely, backup for Microsoft applications needs to be improved.
They should improve the support for backing up containers.
The process of upgrading versions should be improved because as it is now, you have to completely uninstall the old version first, and then install the new version. If we compare this to another product, like Veritas NetBackup, it also has good features but when you upgrade to the latest version, everything is automatic.
I would like to see better cloud integration, such as with AWS or Azure.View full review »
Systems Administrator Team Leader at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
In terms of what can be improved, they need to be compatible with the cloud because EMC NetWorker cannot compete with other products at the moment. The other products like Veeam and Commvault are more flexible and are more compatible with other cloud vendors. EMC cannot do the same thing. EMC focuses only on their own cloud and do not take into consideration other cloud vendors.View full review »
It is not easy to understand and deploy. It is complex in nature. Simplicity is not there. When we deploy it, the customer always needs some training from us. To make it user friendly, there should be one agent that can be used to back up every product. Dell EMC NetWorker uses so many user agents. In PowerProtect Data Manager, you can just install its VM, import that VM into vCenter, and you can start to do backups directly from vCenter. However, in Dell EMC NetWorker, you always need one server, and from that server, you need to initiate all backups. You must know the interface and the CLI. It is not user friendly.
It would be a great feature if we can deploy Dell EMC NetWorker on a virtual machine, like Avamar. The additional features that are required in Dell EMC NetWorker are already available in PowerProtect Data Manager and Avamar. Therefore, there is no need to enhance Dell EMC NetWorker. It would be better if they can just rename it to PowerProtect Data Manager or Avamar.View full review »
It is not easy to understand.
It's not easy to deploy.
It's complex in nature.
When it's deployed, the customers always need to have training from us. In order to make it user-friendly, there is an agent that can be used to back up every product.
Networker users many agents, and just like Powerprotect Data Manager, you can install its VM to import the VM into vCenter, and from Center, you can start your backups.
With NetWorker, you always need to have one server, and from that server, you need to initiate all backups.
You will need to know the interface and NetWorker CLI.
It's not user-friendly.
If NetWorker could be deployed on a virtual machine, similar to Avamar, that would be a great feature.
The features that are required in NetWorker are available in PowerProtect and Avamar. There is no need to enhance Networker, they just need to rename it to PPDM or Avamar. That would be better.View full review »
Sr. Area Technical Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We are having some issues with some of the features. For example, the reporting, or the display of current licensing on the portal need improvement.
The reporting is not to our satisfaction and our main area of concern. It doesn't provide any form of analysis.
There is a delay in the offering from Dell.
Support is definitely an area of concern because of the time it takes to resolve our issues. We should not have to wait long periods of time to have issues resolved. When a complaint is logged the issue should be resolved within a reasonable amount of time.View full review »
Presales Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The scaling can be difficult when updates are involved.
Sometimes the systems come in faster than a producer of the software can react to the new features.
The solution should have better access to Linux or virtual systems of files based on Linux. It doesn't matter if it is a hard installation or only a virtual installation. Sometimes the client doesn't need a backup of the whole system and only needs a handful of files.
The initial setup is complex.
Technical support should be more accessible.View full review »
Administrative at a university with 51-200 employees
Technical support could be improved. They shouldn't just serve those who speak English. The technical support should be in the national language of the country they are servicing and not only in English due to the fact that it's sometimes difficult for us to explain all the things that are going wrong in an unfamiliar language. It creates a communication barrier and makes getting problems solved harder.
The solution is not easy to administer unless you are very familiar with the product.
The licensing rules are difficult to navigate and understand.
The administrator's interface should be much easier to navigate.View full review »
I believe that the reporting could be improved and the report templates should be easier to understand and more comprehensive. I believe they are already working to replace the Java console with the HTML web browser-based administration console which is the other issue. I hope they are able to do this quickly. In terms of my expertise, I can't think of any other issues.
The configuration is too complex. As a backup solution, it's not user-friendly.View full review »
Things could be improved in several areas beginning with support. If you compare it to Commvault or Veritas solutions, their support is better than Networker. In terms of features that are lacking, I think the restore feature is important and it's not available on NetWorker. The other solutions have more programs.
For additional features, I'd like to see integration with any storage place. NetWorker finance also doesn't enable deduplication, there is no source deduplication while using NetWorker, it's only accessible if it's on a different domain. I hope to see that in the next release. I also think the data protection adviser should be embedded in the NetWorker software so there is no need to install another server to collect logs. Finally, the PMR is no longer supported in Linux.View full review »
General Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
They need to take off the tape and allow us to use different repositories in order to keep the data for five to 10 years. The data storage capabilities should be improved.
The next release will include better integration with Data Domain, which is a really good product.View full review »
They have many different products but they don't integrate all of the features into one product. This is an area of failure with this solution. For example, if we want source-side deduplication then we have to use Avamar because this kind of feature isn't available in NetWorker.
Some features in NetWorker are good as well as some features in Avamar are good. If they could combine the features of both products into one single product, it would be better.
In the next release, I would like to see better pricing and more integration with the other products in Dell EMC.View full review »
Chief Financial Officer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
In older versions, the graphical user interface isn't so good.
There should be more vendors incorporated into the solution.View full review »
NetWorker is coming to end-of-life in a couple of years, and even Dell has said that they are not going to continue with it. They no longer develop it.
They put their efforts into the new Power Protect products instead.
Support for the cloud could be better and with the existing features, it could be a bit more robust. Also, the flexibility could be improved.
They need more support for image backups.View full review »
Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The interface is the same, so when we are trying to troubleshoot the logs, it doesn't display properly.
There doesn't seem to be a lot of development with this solution. You don't see any updates with the features, or any development with the features. In general, Dell EMC doesn't seem to be investing much in the R&D of this product. They are selling it off.
I would like to see an improvement with the features in terms of troubleshooting and ease of use.
The documentation is very poor. It takes quite a bit of experience to understand the documentation. A new person who is going through the documentation will not be able to understand. There is no detailed documentation.
The product itself is good, but it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot.
I would like to see the user interface improved, more documentation, faster support, and it could be easier to configure.View full review »
Senior Solutions Sales Consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
When you're working with VMware, you need to use vProxy machines. You have to install the vProxy for every host in the VMware environment.
Also, if the customer needs to integrate or add additional products, it will be integrated with the NetWorker and data domain, the recovery point for VMware, because it covers the gap between the backup windows. You can take snapshots every few minutes depending on the size of the VM to cover the gap between the backup windows. You can restore from any point in time for the backup.View full review »
Data Protection Specialist at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Its console UI should be better. It should also have more out-of-the-box reporting functionalities.
It should also have easier cloud integration. They have got cloud boost and things like that, but if you want to directly back up to the cloud, I'm not too sure whether you can do it. For example, you can easily send data from Commvault to AWS, Azure, or a container, but it seems to be not so easy in NetWorker.View full review »
Snr. Systems Architect at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
There's a lot of room for improvement. The user interface has to be improved.
Sometimes it duplicates jobs. Overall, it's a strong legacy product but there's still a lot of room for improvement.
We have to perform the very basic client registration process twice. We have to do it on the client-side and the NetWorker server-side. Sometimes just re-installing a client can be a nightmare.
Also, the layout can be a bit scattered. It's difficult to learn for a new newcomer. If you work with Linux clients, if you've got another non-Windows system, it's a little bit tough — a little complex.
When it comes to the monitoring of backups, or if you want to grab a certain log, it's not as intuitive as other solutions. For example, if you want to find a backup for a certain client, it's not straightforward. With other solutions, like Avamar, this process is much easier.
Scheduling is complicated. If you use the GUI to create a schedule and you auto mark all your backups SQL, it's simply not there. You have to change the view of the schedule from a calendar view to what they call a non-calendar view. Then you have to modify the attributes. You have to operate in a non-conventional way. Typically, when using the GUI, the expectation is to use the GUI for everything. With this solution, you have to go online to check the logs. You have to do some manipulations here and there — it's complex.
Recovery is also complex. You have to build what we call 'a proper workflow' for recovery.
Modern Data Center and Cloud Engineer II at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It is a little buggy at times, which is the only thing that I dislike about this product. If they could clear up this issue then it would be great because, for the most part, this is a very effective product from my perspective.
I would like to see more integration with third-party products, including both tape and disk products. I want to be able to perform backups not only from Dell EMC. Having this wide level of support would be very much appreciated.
It could be easier to deploy.View full review »
Enterprise Storage Management and UNIX System Administration at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I believe that the area of support could be improved. They don't appear to have an adequate number of staff members to assist us if we have any problems. It would be extremely beneficial if they could provide local support.
I would like to see encryption included in the next release to encrypt the data that we are backing up.View full review »
The components for container support such as Docker and Kubernetes need improvement. They are lacking.
Stability needs improvement. Also, scalability could be better.
I would like to see better support for the container systems, and we would like to see more support for image backups instead of pure file backups. Image backups are faster.View full review »
System Administrator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
The solution could improve by having more integration.View full review »
Business Development Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dell EMC should be more aggressive with its marketing; such as is done by Commvault.
There should be total integration of the replication and cloud logistic back up on cloud.View full review »
System Administration Team Leader at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
The user interface is hard to use, it should be simplified. There are a lot of web-based management interfaces which they should consider.
System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The user interface needs some work.
It would be beneficial to have a single user interface for all of the features.View full review »
The price could be cheaper.View full review »