We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
RS
CIO
Real User
Top 20
Affords us better centralized management over its competitors with simplicity and flexibility of use

Pros and Cons

  • "Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is very simple, easy to use, and flexible."
  • "We feel the product's technical support could be better, as this relates to the solution itself, to the installation of the product, and to having a proper understanding of the case."

What is most valuable?

It is very simple, easy to use, and flexible. It is a top solution with a complete feature set. Its most valuable feature involves its environment. 

What needs improvement?

A pain point worth mentioning is the need of the customer or client to properly know the environment as it relates to the presentation of Forcepoint and to have a better knowledge of the product's implementation. 

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for six years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's very stable product. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We feel Forcepoint's scalability to be pretty easy and good. It works very well. 

How are customer service and technical support?

We feel the product's technical support could be better, as this relates to the solution itself, to the installation of the product, and to having a proper understanding of the case. 

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is not terribly complex. We are talking about three months at the intermediate level. 

While the deployment of a single firewall depends on the environment, this took us between two to five days. 

We employ more than 16 people on our staff for the deployment and maintenance of the solution.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has a good price. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

In addition to Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, we evaluated the concurrency of Palo Alto's features. We feel that Forcepoint affords better centralized management than its competitors.

What other advice do I have?

Our company makes use of every current version of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall. 

Our clients who use Forcepoint run the gamut from small, medium to large businesses. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Implementer
Flag as inappropriate
Koroi Anise
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
Reliable and easy to deploy, covers both network and systems applications

Pros and Cons

  • "Forcepoint is a complete package because it has network and systems applications. Other firewalls are only for the network."
  • "They should have a local vendor who can provide support. Most of the support is overseas, so the time zones can be a problem."

What is our primary use case?

We use it for a government network, here in Fiji.

What is most valuable?

Forcepoint is a complete package because it has network and systems applications. Other firewalls are only for the network. 

For how long have I used the solution?

At the moment we are in a test phase. It's a demo for us. After the trial finishes, we may decide what packages to pay for. We haven't used all the packages.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's very robust. It's very strong compared to every other firewall I've used.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It can handle a lot.

How are customer service and technical support?

They should have a local vendor who can provide support. Most of the support is overseas, so the time zones can be a problem.

When we do contact them they are very easy to work with and very helpful.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward because we did it with someone who came to us with the product. It took us a couple of days and then we tested it before we put it in production.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is expensive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Forcepoint is easier to use than Fortinet. We are also looking at Cisco ASA. But Fortinet and Cisco don't have all the packages that Forcepoint has. It's not comparing like things.

What other advice do I have?

It's a nice product. I haven't come across anything that needs to be improved. It is very capable, very reliable, and easy to deploy. It covers all your networking needs for a big enterprise network. If you have a small business you should go with FortiGate or Cisco.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2021.
554,529 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Koroi Anise
Senior Network Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
Enhances security, facilitates file sharing, and has good SD-WAN capabilities

Pros and Cons

  • "The most valuable feature is SD-WAN."
  • "Forcepoint would be improved if there were more training available."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary uses for Forcepoint are internet access, filtering, and intruder detection. We also use it for file sharing.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is SD-WAN.

What needs improvement?

There is no support available in Fiji, and it would make it easier to have local support and somebody that we can speak with.

The pricing for this solution should be more competitive.

Forcepoint would be improved if there were more training available.

The vendor should make loaner units available for test and evaluation in test environments.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for three to four months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This solution is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

With the SD-WAN capabilities, it is very scalable. We have about 6,000 users.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were previously using a combination of Fortinet and Cisco, but have now upgraded entirely to Forcepoint. Fortinet did not have the same package available as Forcepoint that includes end-point security.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is really easy. It is user-friendly and straightforward.

What about the implementation team?

We had assistance from consultants when we deployed Forcepoint.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Forcepoint is very expensive but it's really secure.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to anybody who is researching this solution is to consider the company's budget. Forcepoint is a very expensive solution but it is also very secure. For smaller companies, I would recommend Fortinet and Cisco, but if you have the money then you can look at Forcepoint.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
SC
IT Director at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
Straightforward to install and has good local support, but the throughput and integration with other products should be improved

Pros and Cons

  • "The people we deal with is a local partner in Cambodia and we can get good support from them."
  • "My team is looking for more throughput and better integration with our security framework."

What is our primary use case?

We are using this solution as our corporate firewall.

What is most valuable?

This solution is quite good.

What needs improvement?

It's a good firewall but we are looking for features that are available in Palo Alto.

My team is looking for more throughput and better integration with our security framework. Better integration with other platforms would be an improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

 We have been using Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for one year.

We are using the latest version.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Forcepoint is stable and we plan to continue using it in the future.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a scalable product. We have approximately 300 users.

How are customer service and technical support?

We can get local support, which has been okay so far.

The people we deal with is a local partner in Cambodia and we can get good support from them.

How was the initial setup?

The installation was not an issue for us.

What about the implementation team?

Our in-house team did it with the help of our local partner.

We have three or four IT people who take care of deployment and maintenance.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are still evaluating other products such as Palo Alto.

One of our goals is to minimize the number of different vendors that we have. Ideally, we would like to have a firewall and security solution with good performance from a single vendor, with a single management console.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
SZ
Team Lead Network Infrastructure at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Security works well, reasonably priced but difficult to configure

Pros and Cons

  • "It is a scalable product. I know a customer who has deployed more than 4,000 firewalls in a single deployment."
  • "Forcepoint is a little difficult to configure compared to its competitors."

What is our primary use case?

The solution has the ability to stop the latest malware threats and any exploits to computer systems.

What is most valuable?

It does well in security, for data security, and it ranks on the top of NSS Lab.

What needs improvement?

Forcepoint is a little difficult to configure compared to its competitors. 

The product could be more user friendly. Firewalls are getting better in graphical user interfaces. If there is an issue with the appliances then the engineering team can work on the command line controls. A cheaper way is a graphical user interface for any users to be able to quickly configuration and implement.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for three years.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a scalable product. I know a customer who has deployed more than 4,000 firewalls in a single deployment.

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support is good.

How was the initial setup?

The installation can take a little while depending on the number of sites that someone has. Usually, for single deployment, it takes one or two days.

What about the implementation team?

In our deployment team, we have over 2000 users.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing of the solution is normally competitive with other products.

What other advice do I have?

I would probably not recommend the product to customers because it is not top of the line. It depends on the customer though, their usage, budget, etc. If they have the budget I would probably recommend Palo Alto Networks, not Forcepoint.

I rate Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall a six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
GM
IT Infra Head at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Good performance, centrally managed, and scales well

Pros and Cons

    • "The security features need to be improved."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use this product to improve our security, as part of our overall solution that includes antivirus, IPS, and other products.

    What is most valuable?

    The centralized management is very good.

    Performance is a good point.

    What needs improvement?

    The security features need to be improved.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We have been using Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall for a few months.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    This is a stable product.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    This solution scales well and the performance is not degraded. We have 35 registered users in the organization.

    How are customer service and technical support?

    We are satisfied with the support.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    Prior to this solution, we were using SonicWall. We switched because we wanted to have a centralized management platform, and we also wanted to increase diversity in our firewall products.

    How was the initial setup?

    This firewall is easy to install, as well as configure.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The pricing should be more competitive against other vendors in the market. We are looking at putting firewalls across all of our locations and want to get a better price so that we can do so. This would be great because we would like to have the same firewall at all of our locations.

    What other advice do I have?

    This is a good product and I have already recommended it to one of my friends that is now implementing it in the educational sector.

    I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    Anwar Sleem
    Regional Director at Ceitcon
    Real User
    Top 5
    Features a scalable firewall and a great VPN

    Pros and Cons

    • "The VPN is great."
    • "The ability to dynamically change policies could be improved."

    What is our primary use case?

    Our customer uses this solution as a standard next-generation firewall and VPN.

    What is most valuable?

    The VPN is great.

    What needs improvement?

    It lacks something called a change of authority. It also lacks more integration with other VPN clients. Also, the ability to dynamically change policies could be improved. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    We installed this solution for one of our customers one year ago.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    This solution is very reliable. 

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    Adding users is very straightforward. 

    How are customer service and technical support?

    I would give their technical support a rating of seven or eight out of ten.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup is very straightforward. It only takes a matter of minutes. 

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The licensing is perpetual. The cost is fair, but it could be improved.

    What other advice do I have?

    If you have Cisco integration, then I wouldn't recommend this solution — it won't integrate. It depends upon the endpoint security. If you have Cisco endpoints, you'll lack certain protections, especially in this multi-vendor environment.

    Overall, on a scale from one to ten, I would give Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall a rating of eight. 

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Integrator
    Flag as inappropriate
    AhmadAlshami
    Senior IT Operations Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    Top 10
    Characterization features captures a lot of threats and they have great support

    Pros and Cons

    • "The support is great. They also have very good categorization. It's very good. It captures a lot of threats."

      What is our primary use case?

      We just use this firewall for security in terms of network access.

      What is most valuable?

      The support is great. They also have very good categorization. It's very good. It captures a lot of threats.

      What needs improvement?

      The first point to improve is just a matter of updates. We are moving to the cloud, so we want to use virtual licenses on the cloud. We need to move from on-premises to the cloud.

      We would love to take another solution from Forcepoint, but unfortunately, the price is too high. That's why we are not considering using Forcepoing for our proxy and DLB. They have a very good DLB, but the matter, in the end, is the cost.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      We have been using this solution for over five years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      It is very stable, especially the front end.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      Yes, this solution is scalable.

      What other advice do I have?

      I recommended Forcepoint to be implemented.

      I would rate this solution as nine out of ten. It would be a full ten if it had integration with endpoints.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.