We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

IBM System Storage DS8000 Series OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

IBM System Storage DS8000 Series is #3 ranked solution in top Frame-Based Disk Arrays. IT Central Station users give IBM System Storage DS8000 Series an average rating of 10 out of 10. IBM System Storage DS8000 Series is most commonly compared to Dell EMC SC Series:IBM System Storage DS8000 Series vs Dell EMC SC Series. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 24% of all views.
What is IBM System Storage DS8000 Series?
IBM System Storage DS8000 series is a high-performance, high-capacity series of disk storage that supports continuous operations. The DS8000 series includes the DS8800 (Models 951 and 95E) and the DS8700 (Models 941 and 94E).

IBM System Storage DS8000 Series is also known as System Storage DS8000.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Frame-Based Disk Arrays Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: November 2021

IBM System Storage DS8000 Series Customers
Renfe, Park Nicollet Health Services, Ricoh Americas Corporation, SK Energy, SWK STADTWERKE KREFELD AG
IBM System Storage DS8000 Series Video

Pricing Advice

What users are saying about IBM System Storage DS8000 Series pricing:
  • "The license is very expensive."

IBM System Storage DS8000 Series Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Keith Miller
Senior Manager, Mainframe Technical Service at Ensono
MSP
Top 5
Great Global Copy and Global Mirror features with an easy initial setup

Pros and Cons

  • "The Global Copy and Global Mirror features are the solution's most valuable aspects."
  • "The solution should embedded replication switches into the hardware instead of using them externally."

What is our primary use case?

We offer it as a Cloud solution to our shared clients and we share these devices between multiple clients. That's how we primarily use the solution.

I use it for storing mainframe data. It's used throughout the mainframe applications and the flash copies for DR, as well as replication utilities, to move data from one facility to another. We use just about all the features on it.

What is most valuable?

The Global Copy and Global Mirror features are the solution's most valuable aspects.

IBM's been making strides, improving, allowing you to do safeguard copies for banking industries, which is another version of a DR copy. However, it's not accessible from any host and not immune. It's just more difficult for hackers or malicious attempts within it. They're not accessible to the normal user. It's a nice new feature that they've come up with.

The initial setup is easy.

What needs improvement?

The pricing of the solution is difficult to deal with. Lower pricing would be preferred. 

The solution should embedded replication switches into the hardware instead of using them externally.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable. There aren't any problems there at all. It doesn't have bugs or glitches and doesn't crash or freeze. We've found it to be very reliable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

While the solution scales and can grow, it's just the pricing for the capacity that grows with it. Organizations need to be aware that the costs will go up as they expand the solution out. The bigger you go, the more you pay.

Currently, we have about 200 users on the solution right now. They just handle setup and management.

The solution is always growing and we're always expanding it.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I've used HDS in the past. I've used EMC Storage Tech, which was bought by Dell at one point. I've used Dell, EMC, Hitachi, etc. All the major players have been used.

How was the initial setup?

We've handled implementation multiple times at this point and we've yet to find the setup complex. It's quite straightforward.

From the receipt of the equipment, the deployment takes probably about three weeks to a month. It doesn't take too long. After that, everything is ready to go.

We have multiple employees that are on the solution handling maintenance.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Right now, the solution bases the pricing on capacity. It can get expensive.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We always look at the competition and do pricing before we ultimately choose which solution we use. That was the case with this product as well. We always look at all the major players in the space.

What other advice do I have?

We're just a customer. We don't have a business relationship with the company.

I'm an outsourcing service provider and I've had a lot of experience using the solution. 

We have everything from DS8100 disc storage, all the way up to 8990s.

I'd advise new users to read the implementation installation guide. Most of the questions are answered in there. People just tend to skim over it and don't get into the details. However, it's important in making everything run smoothly and understanding the solution. That's probably the best advice I've actually heard from anybody. At the end of the day, don't be someone who skips the instructions, and all of a sudden you have a pile of parts.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Ahmed Sabry
Team Leader at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
An advanced enterprise storage system with a powerful throughput feature

Pros and Cons

  • "The high throughput feature is the most powerful thing in this product."
  • "The GUI isn't as user-friendly as other options."

What is our primary use case?

I use this solution to lighten the workload. Oracle databases and SQL databases have a high workload in IBM.

What is most valuable?

The high throughput feature is the most powerful thing in this product.

What needs improvement?

The GUI isn't as user-friendly as other options. The price could also be better. I would like to see a better GUI and a smaller closed system in the next release, like other IBM products, which are more efficient and more user-friendly.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using IBM System Storage DS8000 Series for about 11 years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a very simple product in IBM, and it's stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It's a highly scalable product.

How are customer service and technical support?

The support from IBM hasn't been good for a few years, so I have many issues with support now.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give IBM technical support a seven.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I think the pricing could be better. The license is very expensive.

What other advice do I have?

I'd recommend this solution to others, but I'd tell them first to check if that can code for it.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give IBM System Storage DS8000 Series a ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Product Categories
Frame-Based Disk Arrays
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Frame-Based Disk Arrays Report and find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Dell EMC, Hitachi, and more!