Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Room for Improvement
The solution is very costly. The cost is very high, especially considering a lot of other resources are available now and they are less expensive. For a small organization, it is very difficult to sustain the costs involved in having the solution or the related fees.
The technical support aspect of the solution could be improved.
Their current dashboard and their reporting is still following the earlier waterfall models. If they can add some things in the reporting, and update it so it is more modern, that would be great.View full review »
Performance Engineer with 10,001+ employees
I have not had a really good look at the newest versions of LoadRunner. The problem I have always had with LoadRunner — and even more so with Performance Center — is that it is not very good with agile delivery and it is very difficult to integrate. Software engineers who have been working in agile delivery have been saying this for some time, and have been having success with alternatives.
Also, Performance Center has historically been quite unreliable and difficult. It tends to fail at collation. I think that is because of the Load Runner architecture that Performance Center inherited. Everything waits until the end of a test to collate and it does not always work out well. I know that Micro Focus has done something about that in the new version. But that is the worst thing that happens: with LoadRunner or Performance Center you run a big critical test and you can't get the results.View full review »
Test Automation, DevOps & Performance Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I would like to see easier integration with our CICD pipeline.
The product is pretty heavy and should be more lightweight.
I would like to see a browser extension where we can start the development. This would be helpful because right now, this solution is good for UTM integration and performance testing, but if we want to scale then it is difficult.View full review »
Regional Head Customer Experience at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
My team members predominately used the product to do development but I don't think it needs anything in a way of improvements.View full review »
It's a very expensive tool so I think licensing costs could be reduced. I think their monitoring services in real time could be improved and made more user friendly.View full review »
Senior Load & Performance Test Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
If they were able to, I would say that the scalability could be improved. If the costs were not as expensive to upgrade, then we would scale it more.
The initial setup could be simplified.
I would like to see better licensing costs.View full review »