We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

What is Palo Alto Networks IoT Security?

Protect every device on your network with the industry's most comprehensive IoT Security solution.

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Video

Palo Alto Networks IoT Security Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
Anil Redekar
Senior Network Engineer at Infosys
Real User
Good high throughput and low latency with a great Sp3 Engine
Pros and Cons
  • "Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency."
  • "The cost is still high and licensing is still complex."

What is our primary use case?

In our organization, we use the product "PA 3220" for Security and NAT policy configuration to block unwanted traffic. We can create different zones in our network, such as trusted, untrusted, DMZ. advance threat protection, and anti-malware protection. 

We can create site-to-site and remote site VPNs as per users' requests. With the help of the SP3 engine, we can allow traffic with a high level of performance. We are able to configure the high availability as Active-Active or Active-Passive to load balance the traffic on the firewall interface. A vulnerability assessment is also done.

How has it helped my organization?

All the applications are classified on the basis of their features and functions.

The Sp3 Engine has helped us. Whenever any packet comes to the Palo Alto then a parallel process and single-pass activity are there. A fast packet forwarding mechanism is used here. 

Single-pass traffic processing enables very high throughput and low latency. Single-pass software and parallel processing hardware are completely unique in network security.

We take advantage of a user behavior monitor and threat protection.

What is most valuable?

The Sp3 Engine is helpful. Single Pass software and Parallel Processing hardware are completely unique in network security.

This significantly reduces the amount of processing overhead required to perform multiple functions in one security device.

SP3 engine is most suitable for Next-Generation Firewalls.

What needs improvement?

All the features are good here as compared to other Next-Generation firewalls, however, some steps of configuration are complex and require hiring experienced staff. The cost is still high and licensing is still complex.

The current version Pan OS v10.0 is a more stable version now - most of the bugs and issues are fixed.

There's no need to add any points from my side about this product. It's a very good Next-Generation Firewall in our current environment.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used the solution for around the last three years.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate