We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Tricentis NeoLoad Pros

Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.
View full review »
SG
Performance Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I feel that the codeless part, the dynamic value capture part is quite easy in NeoLoad compared to other tools.
View full review »
Associate at Tech Mahindra Limited
The stability is okay.
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Deputy Manager at BSH
It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing.
View full review »
Release Test Manager at a tech company with 201-500 employees
The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.
View full review »
JB
Director, IT DevOps & Quality Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.
View full review »
GN
Performance Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.
View full review »
Automation Test Engineer and Team Lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.
View full review »

Tricentis NeoLoad Cons

Technical Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.
View full review »
SG
Performance Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The SAP area could be improved.
View full review »
Associate at Tech Mahindra Limited
LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all.
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Deputy Manager at BSH
We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times.
View full review »
Release Test Manager at a tech company with 201-500 employees
Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.
View full review »
JB
Director, IT DevOps & Quality Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.
View full review »
GN
Performance Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I would like to see support for auto-correlations.
View full review »
Automation Test Engineer and Team Lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.
View full review »
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis NeoLoad. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.