We all know it's really hard to get good pricing and cost information.
Please share what you can so you can help your peers.
The solution is priced well and there is a license for this solution that we pay annually for.
I can't directly speak to the price of the solution. It's not an aspect of the solution I handle.
The solution isn't too expensive. It's reasonable, especially if you compare it to other options on the market.
The price of Panorama is expensive.
It is not a cheap solution.
Palo Alto is expensive and there are many cheaper firewalls, but they do not work as well.
In terms of licensing for Panorama and Palo Alto products, we have only the DMC cost and we are billed every year. It's not overly expensive. It is comparatively okay if you look at other devices. Compared to the top three devices, pricing is okay due to the fact that you have multiple vendors who are selling firewalls and competing with each other for the same clients.
The pricing model is reasonable for this class of solutions.
The pricing is too high for us. We'd like it to be more affordable.
We pay approximately $3,000 a year in order to use the product.
If you compare the price of this solution to other management solutions, it is relatively low. You only pay for the license and there are no additional costs.
Initially, Palo Alto looks expensive, but if you dig deeper then you will find that it is very comparable, or even cheaper than other solutions. For example, if you are looking for a one-gig next-generation firewall then you will start looking at the Palo Alto 850. If you compare the price of this to Fortinet, Worksense, Forcepoint, or Sophos, then you will see that they offer three or four gig performance at half the price. However, it is not true. The reason for this is that not all of the security features are enabled. When you enable them, the performance degrades by more than ninety percent, and I have seen this happen in many different scenarios. This means that for the Palo Alto 1GB, it actually means 1GB with all of the functionality enabled. For the other vendors, you will never see their datasheet with all of the functionality enabled for a real environment with real traffic. It is based on lab traffic. Because the reality is that the performance of Palo Alto is better, it means that the price is better. When you compare models using real performance, and you do the calculation, you will see that Palo Alto is very comparable.
The licensing is not cheap. There are always hidden costs. You have support costs, or maybe you need to buy more optics on how the solution fits into the rest of your environment. It is possible some of the rest of your environment will need to change too.