We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
22 Answers

author avatar
Top 5Real User

The response times could be faster. When you are with Amazon and use Glacier, you expect a response time between four to seven hours to retrieve the data. People will want to keep the content for a longer time, but they want to make shorter windows for that. It will help if they make that according to the SLA, for example, SLA level 1, SLA level 2, and SLA level 3, and make a premium SLA for Glacier and make it one hour and 15 minutes to retrieve it. All this will enhance the utilization of Glacier for our client's content. IT people will think that even archive should be faster, but archive means delivery is faster. It should guarantee content integrity at a certain time when you need the information.

author avatar
Real User

I can't think of any improvements. It's a self-sustainable platform. We don't have anything which we need to add on. We are quite happy with the service. Writing and storing data is very efficient. However, when you want to retrieve the data, it is a little bit time consuming because it specifies to retrieve the data it is going to take time, so you must make sure you log store the data which you will be accessing or which you will need very frequently.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, Microsoft, Google and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: January 2022.
564,322 professionals have used our research since 2012.