Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Commvault HyperScale X.
What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
You can manage everything from two interfaces. There is a Java console (CommCell), but in the near future that will be fully replaced by the Command Center, the HTML5 interface. The Java interface is not great. The Command Center interface is far better and it looks nicer, but it doesn't have all the powerful features available in the Java console. The place to improve the product is on the management interface level because that's the point where it's not perfect. Today, to manage the product, you just have to use both interfaces. The Java interface is basically for the admin because it has all the powerful features in it. The HTML5 interface is mainly used by end-users, and by admins when they just need to generate a report or see something graphically to help with the management of Commvault. One other note. I would rate the ransomware feature at about eight out of 10. There are different processes for enabling ransomware protection on Windows versus Linux systems. In the current version, there is no ransomware for HyperScale X. That feature has been released in CV SP 24.
What do you like most about Commvault HyperScale X?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts with the community!
Hi community members,
Are you aware of and can recommend any decent tool to automate DRP?
*Some organizations still have their own data center and back applications reside there.