We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why
2019-10-21T13:15:00Z

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiWLM?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Fortinet FortiWLM.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
66 Answers

author avatar
Top 5Reseller

There is a need to put a logging device in, which could be an analyzer, so that, if you want to have an inside-up graph and weekly and monthly graphics reports, you'd be able to do so. When using the FortiGate as the wireless controller, you cannot have automatic user registration, which is something that they should offer. That way, you can email the user, in their account, and it would be easier.

2021-11-03T20:01:46Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

In the next release, they could improve by adding a controller-less server, or architecture that is provided in other solutions, such as Aruba. This would be a great benefit for customers. Additionally, they could improve the feature sets to be more competitive.

2021-07-27T16:07:36Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Documentation could be improved.

2020-03-04T08:49:00Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

Something that can be improved by Fortinet is the organization-wide policy on service contracts. I find that it is a little bit stressful. They have a business model where whatever you buy, you must make a service contract. You can do that for one year or three years or five years. But it seems a little bit like a moneymaking machine rather than a necessity. They require these service contracts and that is not always so well accepted by the clients. To judge the circumstances of the market by bigger business clients who can afford these additional fees may not be the best way to create policy. I work mostly with smaller clients on the threshold of breaking into a bigger business landscape. Mostly those clients are private people and for these people, these business requirements Fortinet has in place are not the best way to build up their successes. I guess I cannot criticize their practices as failing because the company is obviously successful with it. I understand that they also need to make money for evolution, for research and development to stay competitive. But for the private sector, there is a gap. You have these professional suppliers like Aruba and Fortinet and then you have the small suppliers whose products you can buy in the shop around the corner. There is nothing in between. I think Fortinet could be more friendly toward smaller companies and individuals so they could have success with the products while building their businesses and then they are more likely to continue to use the products later. I guess one other improvement they might consider making is with the design of the product. They do not have the most beautiful equipment I have seen in my life. They could hire a designer and the products could be improved substantially in a visual way.

2020-01-27T06:39:00Z
author avatar
Top 5Reseller

The guest management features need to be improved by adding automation. There is a facility for guest management through a portal, but it should be automatic. As it is now, the IT person has to edit and do things manually. All of the details should be maintained in the FortiCloud. I would like to see some small access points or signal extenders added to the product line to help with areas that do not have full coverage.

2020-01-22T12:44:00Z
author avatar
Real User

This solution should be easier to set up in a production environment.

2019-10-21T13:15:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Aruba Networks, Cisco and others in Wireless LAN. Updated: January 2022.
563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.