We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

What needs improvement with McAfee Active Response?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with McAfee Active Response.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
11 Answer

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReseller

It's still not lightweight enough and not as light as they claim to be with the McAfee area of a next-gen AV. They can do some improvements along that line. There needs to be some improvement around the white-listing or black-listing. The product could improve aspects around the removal of blacklisted applications, et cetera. This was an exercise to centralize the AV cell, and that's how we ended up upgrading. The truth, however, is that I was really looking for something much more advanced with user behavior analytics and some AI features that the other competitor's next-gen AV does offer. It is okay for what it's doing now, however, it's not the ultimate software. There are some components on the cloud that should also reside in the on-prem deployment models but don't. They should ensure they are doing parallel development for cloud and on-prem when they are doing R&D.

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee, Microsoft, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: January 2022.
563,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.